The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2023
DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2023.3649
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of 3-Dimensional Stereophotogrammetry to Detect Disease Progression in Craniofacial Morphea

Katharina S. Shaw,
Tyler T. Nguyen,
Ahmad Rajeh
et al.

Abstract: ImportanceObjectively determining disease progression in craniofacial morphea (CM) is challenging, as clinical findings of disease activity are often lacking.ObjectiveTo evaluate the utility of 3-dimensional (3D) stereophotogrammetry in detecting disease progression in CM over time.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis prospective cohort study included 27 pediatric and adult patients with CM from 2 hospitals in Boston (Boston Children’s Hospital and Brigham & Women’s Hospital) consecutively enrolle… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Potential biomarkers studied currently include expression of CXCL9, CXCL10, and chemokines in interferon-regulated pathways . Imaging studies may also provide objective outcome measures, particularly magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography, and 3-dimensional stereophotogrammetry . Further work is needed to validate these as markers of disease activity in the clinical and research setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Potential biomarkers studied currently include expression of CXCL9, CXCL10, and chemokines in interferon-regulated pathways . Imaging studies may also provide objective outcome measures, particularly magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography, and 3-dimensional stereophotogrammetry . Further work is needed to validate these as markers of disease activity in the clinical and research setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%