Abstract:Purpose The purpose of the study was to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of a nurse-led mobile phone call intervention on glycemic management and adherence to self-management practices among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in Ghana. Methods This was a pilot randomized controlled trial to compare diabetes care as usual to a mobile phone call intervention delivered by nurses in addition to care as usual over a 12-week period in a tertiary referral hospital in Ghana. Sixty patients with T2… Show more
“…Length of the interventions varied, ranging from 4 weeks [ 42 ] to 48 months [ 37 ]. The majority of the programs (63.2%) were delivered at tertiary care facilities [ 26 , 29 , 30 , 34 , 36 , 38 ] and clinics [ 28 , 35 , 37 , 41 – 43 ]. Five interventions [ 27 , 31 , 32 , 39 , 40 ] were delivered at health centers, and one at both tertiary and secondary care facilities [ 33 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Six interventions [ 26 , 33 , 34 , 38 , 41 , 42 ] were delivered by an interdisciplinary team of health professionals, such as doctors/physicians, nurses, dietitians/nutritionists, and medical social workers. Five interventions [ 28 – 30 , 36 , 37 ] were delivered by nurses, three [ 25 , 27 , 35 ] by peer educators, two [ 40 , 43 ] by diabetes health educators, two [ 32 , 39 ] by dietitians and one [ 31 ] by health promoters—paid non-medically trained professionals whose work is to promote public health.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Outcomes for diabetes-related behaviors reported in the included studies were: dietary practices, physical activity/exercise, foot care, blood glucose self-monitoring, smoking, alcohol consumption, and medication adherence. Dietary practices were reported in seven studies; four [ 23 , 30 , 39 , 40 ] demonstrated significant improvements, three [ 27 , 31 , 36 ] reported no significant changes. Physical activity or exercise was measured in six studies [ 25 , 30 , 31 , 36 , 41 , 42 ]; only two [ 25 , 42 ] demonstrated significant positive effects.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dietary practices were reported in seven studies; four [ 23 , 30 , 39 , 40 ] demonstrated significant improvements, three [ 27 , 31 , 36 ] reported no significant changes. Physical activity or exercise was measured in six studies [ 25 , 30 , 31 , 36 , 41 , 42 ]; only two [ 25 , 42 ] demonstrated significant positive effects. Foot care practices were assessed in four studies; three [ 25 , 36 , 42 ] reported significant improvements, one [ 31 ] showed no significant positive change.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physical activity or exercise was measured in six studies [ 25 , 30 , 31 , 36 , 41 , 42 ]; only two [ 25 , 42 ] demonstrated significant positive effects. Foot care practices were assessed in four studies; three [ 25 , 36 , 42 ] reported significant improvements, one [ 31 ] showed no significant positive change. Self-monitoring of blood glucose was an outcome measure in two studies [ 30 , 36 ]; all demonstrating no significant improvements.…”
Introduction
Diabetes mellitus (DM) is one of the commonest chronic diseases worldwide. Self-Management Education (SME) is regarded as a critical element of treatment for all people with diabetes, as well as those at risk of developing the condition. While a great variety of diabetes self-management education (DSME) interventions are available in high-income countries, limited information exists on educational programs for the prevention and management of diabetes complications in Africa. This study, therefore, aimed at synthesizing information in the literature to describe the state of the science of DSME interventions in the WHO African Region.
Materials and methods
The study is a scoping review, which followed the standard PRISMA guidelines for conducting and reporting scoping reviews. A systematic keyword and subject headings searches were conducted on six electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) to identify relevant English language publications on DSME from 2000 through 2020. Titles and abstracts of the search results were screened to select eligible papers for full text reading. All eligible papers were retrieved and full text screening was done by three independent reviewers to select studies for inclusion in the final analysis.
Results
Nineteen studies were included in the review. The interventions identified were individually oriented, group-based, individually oriented & group-based, and information technology-based DSME programs. Outcomes of the interventions were mixed. While the majority yielded significant positive results on HbA1c, diabetes knowledge, blood pressure, blood sugar and foot care practices; few demonstrated positive outcomes on self-efficacy, BMI, physical activity; self-monitoring of blood glucose, medication adherence, smoking and alcohol consumption.
Conclusions
The limited studies available indicate that DSME interventions in the WHO African Region have mixed effects on patient behaviors and health outcomes. That notwithstanding, the majority of the interventions demonstrated statistically significant positive effects on HbA1c, the main outcome measure in most DSME intervention studies.
“…Length of the interventions varied, ranging from 4 weeks [ 42 ] to 48 months [ 37 ]. The majority of the programs (63.2%) were delivered at tertiary care facilities [ 26 , 29 , 30 , 34 , 36 , 38 ] and clinics [ 28 , 35 , 37 , 41 – 43 ]. Five interventions [ 27 , 31 , 32 , 39 , 40 ] were delivered at health centers, and one at both tertiary and secondary care facilities [ 33 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Six interventions [ 26 , 33 , 34 , 38 , 41 , 42 ] were delivered by an interdisciplinary team of health professionals, such as doctors/physicians, nurses, dietitians/nutritionists, and medical social workers. Five interventions [ 28 – 30 , 36 , 37 ] were delivered by nurses, three [ 25 , 27 , 35 ] by peer educators, two [ 40 , 43 ] by diabetes health educators, two [ 32 , 39 ] by dietitians and one [ 31 ] by health promoters—paid non-medically trained professionals whose work is to promote public health.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Outcomes for diabetes-related behaviors reported in the included studies were: dietary practices, physical activity/exercise, foot care, blood glucose self-monitoring, smoking, alcohol consumption, and medication adherence. Dietary practices were reported in seven studies; four [ 23 , 30 , 39 , 40 ] demonstrated significant improvements, three [ 27 , 31 , 36 ] reported no significant changes. Physical activity or exercise was measured in six studies [ 25 , 30 , 31 , 36 , 41 , 42 ]; only two [ 25 , 42 ] demonstrated significant positive effects.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dietary practices were reported in seven studies; four [ 23 , 30 , 39 , 40 ] demonstrated significant improvements, three [ 27 , 31 , 36 ] reported no significant changes. Physical activity or exercise was measured in six studies [ 25 , 30 , 31 , 36 , 41 , 42 ]; only two [ 25 , 42 ] demonstrated significant positive effects. Foot care practices were assessed in four studies; three [ 25 , 36 , 42 ] reported significant improvements, one [ 31 ] showed no significant positive change.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physical activity or exercise was measured in six studies [ 25 , 30 , 31 , 36 , 41 , 42 ]; only two [ 25 , 42 ] demonstrated significant positive effects. Foot care practices were assessed in four studies; three [ 25 , 36 , 42 ] reported significant improvements, one [ 31 ] showed no significant positive change. Self-monitoring of blood glucose was an outcome measure in two studies [ 30 , 36 ]; all demonstrating no significant improvements.…”
Introduction
Diabetes mellitus (DM) is one of the commonest chronic diseases worldwide. Self-Management Education (SME) is regarded as a critical element of treatment for all people with diabetes, as well as those at risk of developing the condition. While a great variety of diabetes self-management education (DSME) interventions are available in high-income countries, limited information exists on educational programs for the prevention and management of diabetes complications in Africa. This study, therefore, aimed at synthesizing information in the literature to describe the state of the science of DSME interventions in the WHO African Region.
Materials and methods
The study is a scoping review, which followed the standard PRISMA guidelines for conducting and reporting scoping reviews. A systematic keyword and subject headings searches were conducted on six electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) to identify relevant English language publications on DSME from 2000 through 2020. Titles and abstracts of the search results were screened to select eligible papers for full text reading. All eligible papers were retrieved and full text screening was done by three independent reviewers to select studies for inclusion in the final analysis.
Results
Nineteen studies were included in the review. The interventions identified were individually oriented, group-based, individually oriented & group-based, and information technology-based DSME programs. Outcomes of the interventions were mixed. While the majority yielded significant positive results on HbA1c, diabetes knowledge, blood pressure, blood sugar and foot care practices; few demonstrated positive outcomes on self-efficacy, BMI, physical activity; self-monitoring of blood glucose, medication adherence, smoking and alcohol consumption.
Conclusions
The limited studies available indicate that DSME interventions in the WHO African Region have mixed effects on patient behaviors and health outcomes. That notwithstanding, the majority of the interventions demonstrated statistically significant positive effects on HbA1c, the main outcome measure in most DSME intervention studies.
Background
Although previous systematic reviews have studied medication adherence interventions among people with Type 2 diabetes (PwT2D), no intervention has been found to improve medication adherence consistently. Furthermore, inconsistent and poor reporting of intervention description has made understanding, replication, and evaluation of intervention challenging.
Purpose
We aimed to identify the behavior change techniques (BCTs) and characteristics of successful medication adherence interventions among PwT2D.
Methods
A systematic search was conducted on Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and Scopus. Studies were included if they were randomized controlled trials with BCT-codable interventions designed to influence adherence to anti-diabetic medication for PwT2D aged 18 years old and above and have medication adherence measure as an outcome.
Results
Fifty-five studies were included. Successful interventions tend to target medication adherence only, involve pharmacists as the interventionist, contain “Credible source” (BCT 9.1), “Instruction on how to perform the behaviour” (BCT 4.1), “Social support (practical)” (BCT 3.2), “Action planning” (BCT 1.4), and/ or “Information about health consequences” (BCT 5.1). Very few interventions described its context, used theory, examined adherence outcomes during the follow-up period after an intervention has ended, or were tailored to address specific barriers of medication adherence.
Conclusion
We identified specific BCTs and characteristics that are commonly reported in successful medication adherence interventions, which can facilitate the development of future interventions. Our review highlighted the need to consider and clearly describe different dimensions of context, theory, fidelity, and tailoring in an intervention.
Background: Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is one of the chronic non-communicable diseases that has currently been very common, in particular Diabetes Mellitus type 2 that threatens public health. It has been included in the category of the six biggest causes of worldwide death, but self-control of treatment and obedience to self-care is still low. One of the influencing factors is related to the lack of knowledge. Providing ongoing health education is one of the solutions or efforts to strengthen knowledge in type 2 diabetes. The aim was to identify the various health education methods currently used by nurses and their impacts on type 2 DM. The method used is a literature review. The literature was searched on data based on Scopus, Web of Science, SAGE, CINAHL with the keywords methods or interventions, education, health, nursing, and type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Fifteen (15) pieces of literature were considered to meet the criteria inclusion. Results: Three (3) types of health education methods used by nurses were identified: 1). Direct health education refers to providing education by nurses to patients through training, coaching, interviews, Focus Group Discussion (FGD), and home visits; 2). Indirect Health Education - using mobile phones; 3). The mix of direct health education and the use of mobile phone-based applications is carried out with the application of mobile health technology and nurse health coaching. The impact of providing health education by nurses to type 2 diabetic patients: increasing of knowledge, behavioral change on preventing diabetes complications, increasing self-efficacy, increasing self-care activities (diet management, physical activity, monitoring blood sugar levels, and foot care). Conclusion: various methods of health education carried out by nurses currently have a positive impact on improving and increasing self-care management and efforts to prevent complications in type 2 diabetes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.