2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.inoche.2010.09.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pillow-shaped porous CuO as anode material for lithium-ion batteries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
20
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The first discharge capacity is measured to be 1143 mAh g −1 , which is higher than the theoretical capacity of 670 mAh g −1 based on a maximum uptake of 2 Li per CuO. This extra observed in capacity can be attributed to the formation of solid electrolyte interface layer, which has been confirmed by many authors . A reversible capacity up to 516 mAh g −1 after 100 cycles is delivered and the coulombic efficiency is above 98% from the second cycle.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The first discharge capacity is measured to be 1143 mAh g −1 , which is higher than the theoretical capacity of 670 mAh g −1 based on a maximum uptake of 2 Li per CuO. This extra observed in capacity can be attributed to the formation of solid electrolyte interface layer, which has been confirmed by many authors . A reversible capacity up to 516 mAh g −1 after 100 cycles is delivered and the coulombic efficiency is above 98% from the second cycle.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…For example, Cao et al [11] and Jiang et al [12] 13 developed porous CuO-Fe2O3 and CuO/CeO2 composite catalysts respectively for carbon monoxide oxidation; Wang et al [13] synthesized porous CuO nanorods and Wan et al [14] prepared pillow-shaped porous CuO as anode materials for lithium-ion batteries; Samarasekara et al [15] found that porous CuO is a prime candidate in the application of carbon dioxide gas sensors and Hoa et al [16] …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This further demonstrates that the mesoporous CuO microspheres with a higher surface area perform better. Although the capacity of mesoporous CuO-1 microspheres obtained here at 0.1 C after 50 cycles is lower than that of hollow CuO microspheres (600 mAh g À1 at 0.2 C) [46], and CuO nanorods (650 mAh g À1 at 0.5 C) [47], it is much higher than needle-like CuO (441 mAh g À1 at 0.1 C) [24], and pillow-shaped porous CuO (320 mAh g À1 at 0.1 C) [48]. Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%