Pillars of the Global Innovation Index by income level of economies: longitudinal data (2011-2022) for researchers’ use

Brás, Gonçalo Rodrigues

doi:10.1016/j.dib.2022.108818

Cited by 9 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…We use panel data from the Global Innovation Index (GII), compiled by Brás (2023), spanning 12 years from 2011 to 2022. Even though the GII is not the only “scoreboard” of country-level innovation, it has several advantages compared to others.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…We used GII’s innovation outputs sub-index as the outcome condition, since it reflects the results of innovative activities within the country (WIPO, 2022), and has been used in previous studies (Crespo and Crespo, 2016; Tekic and Tekic, 2021). We used the score of innovation outputs, gathered from Brás (2023), which range from 0 to 100 where higher scores mean better performances.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This sub-index captures the performance of five pillars: institutions, human capital and research, infrastructure, market sophistication and business sophistication (WIPO, 2022), which gauge countries' investment (or efforts) in innovation activities. The scores of innovation inputs, which were gathered from Brás (2023), range from 0 to 100, with higher scores meaning better performance.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Does culture moderate the innovation input–output relationship? A two-stage configurational analysis

Duarte,

Carvalho

2024

CCSM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThis study analyses configurations of national culture as boundary conditions of countries’ national systems of innovation (NSI). Drawing from the NSI approach, we argue that culture’s role is that of a contingency factor shaping the relationship between investments in innovation and national innovation outputs.Design/methodology/approachWe assessed the moderation effect of national culture through a systematic, two-stage approach using fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA), which allows the analysis of changes induced by the moderator variables. Analyses were conducted with a diverse sample of 61 countries over a period spanning 12 years, from 2011 to 2022.FindingsFindings reveal that investments in innovation, but not individual cultural dimensions, is a necessary condition for high innovation outputs. Furthermore, several configurations of cultural dimensions were identified as moderators of the relationship between investments in innovation and innovation outputs.Originality/valueThis study provides insights into cross-national innovation research by exposing the role of cultural configurations, rather than just individual cultural dimensions, as boundary conditions involved in the achievement of high levels of innovation.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Does culture moderate the innovation input–output relationship? A two-stage configurational analysis

Duarte,

Carvalho

2024

CCSM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The most common ranking for assessing the efficiency of countries' innovation ecosystems is the Global Innovation Index (GII), which is published by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) and covers a large amount of up-to-date data on various aspects of countries' innovation potential and the results of its utilization. The GII indicators can be used to assess the potential, performance, dynamics, and structural features and conduct qualitative comparative analysis of countries' innovation ecosystems (Yu et al, 2021;Brás, 2023;Nasir & Zhang, 2024).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Differentiation of innovation ecosystems of the countries being the Global Innovation Index leaders in the global competitive context

Polyakov,

Khanin,

Bilozubenko

et al. 2024

Problems and Perspectives in Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Innovations have become pivotal for the growth and competitiveness of national economies. Generating innovations necessitates a comprehensive ecosystem as a set of conducive conditions. With competition intensifying and focusing on innovation, countries increasingly prioritize the enhancement of their innovation ecosystems. The foundation for this lies in international comparisons, particularly among countries that are global leaders, as it aids in identifying their specific characteristics and advantages. The aim of the study is to differentiate the innovation ecosystems of world-leading countries by highlighting the indicators in which they differ the most.The paper covered the top 15 countries according to the Global Innovation Index, each characterized by 23 indicators in their innovation ecosystems. In the first stage, using mathematical processing (the k-means method), the countries were divided into six clusters. Then, to find the parameters that differentiate the obtained clusters, a classification analysis was conducted (the “decision tree” method), resulting in 11 indicators that, in various pairwise combinations, most differentiate the analyzed countries. These indicators reflect the features and most important advantages (or weaknesses) of each innovation ecosystem and are also priorities for increasing the parameters of these ecosystems to improve the position of countries. It is advisable to use these indicators to form state innovation policy.

show abstract

“…In recent years, various international analytical rankings have gained wide popularity, becoming an integral part of monitoring and an important basis for making management decisions. In the field of innovations, the most authoritative is the Global Innovation Index (GII), which is prepared by Cornell University, INSEAD, and WIPO (Brás, 2023). The GII assesses various dimensions of countries' innovation systems, their innovation competence and competitiveness.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Determining the key factors of the innovation gap between EU countries

Polyakov

Khanin

Shevchenko

et al. 2023

Problems and Perspectives in Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Innovation plays a crucial role in ensuring economic growth and competitiveness of national economies, creating conditions for their sustainable development. By focusing on supporting innovation, the EU is particularly helping to accelerate the development of those member states that lag far behind the EU average. This requires the selection of the indicators reflecting the development of innovation that determine the differences between member countries to the greatest extent. Therefore, the aim of the study is to identify the key factors of the innovation gap (FIG) between EU countries based on a comparison of indicators characterizing the national innovation systems (NIS). For this purpose, 22 relative indicators were selected from the indicators included in the Global Innovation Index to form an array of empirical data. At the first stage, the EU countries were divided into four clusters using the k-means method. At the second stage, using the decision tree method, a group of indicators was identified that together distinguish the obtained clusters to the greatest extent and, accordingly, determine the differences between EU countries and can be considered as FIG, namely: “Researchers”, “GERD financed by business”, “Joint venture/strategic alliance deals”, “Software spending”, and “High-tech manufacturing”. This allows individual member states to prioritize the development of those indicators (i.e. FIG) that most determine their position in the EU and therefore improve their NIS. At the EU level, this will contribute to the complementarity of the NIS, overcome differences between member states and increase the overall level of convergence in innovation.

show abstract

Pillars of the Global Innovation Index by income level of economies: longitudinal data (2011-2022) for researchers’ use

Cited by 9 publications

References 12 publications

Does culture moderate the innovation input–output relationship? A two-stage configurational analysis

Does culture moderate the innovation input–output relationship? A two-stage configurational analysis

Differentiation of innovation ecosystems of the countries being the Global Innovation Index leaders in the global competitive context

Determining the key factors of the innovation gap between EU countries

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About