2018
DOI: 10.1093/gigascience/giy123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PiGx: reproducible genomics analysis pipelines with GNU Guix

Abstract: In bioinformatics, as well as other computationally intensive research fields, there is a need for workflows that can reliably produce consistent output, from known sources, independent of the software environment or configuration settings of the machine on which they are executed. Indeed, this is essential for controlled comparison between different observations and for the wider dissemination of workflows. However, providing this type of reproducibility and traceability is often complicated by the need to ac… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(42 reference statements)
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Raw RNA‐seq data were downloaded from the NCBI‐GEO or EBI ArrayExpress databases (Table S1) and processed using the PiGx RNA‐seq pipeline version 0.0.10 (Wurmus et al, ) using default settings and ENSEMBLE genome assemblies for mouse (GRCm38.p6, release 96), human (GRCh38.p13, release 97), and rat (Rnor_6.0, release 98). Based on the initial analysis reports generated by the PiGx pipeline individual replicates that did not separate well between neurite and soma samples were excluded from further analysis (Table S1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Raw RNA‐seq data were downloaded from the NCBI‐GEO or EBI ArrayExpress databases (Table S1) and processed using the PiGx RNA‐seq pipeline version 0.0.10 (Wurmus et al, ) using default settings and ENSEMBLE genome assemblies for mouse (GRCm38.p6, release 96), human (GRCh38.p13, release 97), and rat (Rnor_6.0, release 98). Based on the initial analysis reports generated by the PiGx pipeline individual replicates that did not separate well between neurite and soma samples were excluded from further analysis (Table S1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(b) Annotation of the datasets: model system and cell type; citation; the species of a dataset (human, mouse, or rat); the separation method for outgrowths and cell bodies; the method of data acquisition. RNA‐seq studies were re‐analyzed using the PiGx RNA‐seq pipeline (Wurmus et al, ). If studies used different analysis methods (*) or raw data was unavailable (**), transcript detection levels were obtained from supplementary data of the respective studies…”
Section: Comparative Analysis Of Transcriptome‐wide Neuronal Mrna Locmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ChIP‐seq sequencing datasets were processed using the PiGx‐ChIP‐seq (Wurmus et al, ) pipeline (version 0.0.16), in which the quality of the raw fastq reads was improved using Trim Galore (https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/trim_galore/), processed reads were aligned to the DNA sequence assembly WBcel235 (Ensembl version 89) using Bowtie2 (Langmead & Salzberg, ), the peaks were called using MACS2 (Zhang et al, ), and the IDR (irreproducible discovery rate) peaks were called using the IDR software (Li, Qunhua Li, Brown, Huang, & Bickel, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RNA-seq data were analyzed using the pigx-rnaseq pipeline (Wurmus et al, 2018). STAR (Dobin et al, 2013) mapped the reads to the GRCm38 assembly for mouse by Ensembl, and HTSeq (Anders et al, 2015) was used to count the transcript abundance.…”
Section: Rna-seqmentioning
confidence: 99%