2009
DOI: 10.3758/lb.37.1.74
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pigeons’ memory for time: Assessment of the role of subjective shortening in the duration-comparison procedure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Future studies need to differentiate the role of these circuits, and to clarify the neurobiological mechanisms involved in the monitoring, maintenance and reallocation of attentional and working memory resources involved in interval timing, subjective shortening and the categorical scaling of duration (e.g. Meck 2005;Santi et al 2007;Penney et al 2008;Pfeuty et al 2008;Wittmann et al 2008;van Rooyen & Santi 2009). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future studies need to differentiate the role of these circuits, and to clarify the neurobiological mechanisms involved in the monitoring, maintenance and reallocation of attentional and working memory resources involved in interval timing, subjective shortening and the categorical scaling of duration (e.g. Meck 2005;Santi et al 2007;Penney et al 2008;Pfeuty et al 2008;Wittmann et al 2008;van Rooyen & Santi 2009). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although many studies have explored appreciations of numerical ordering in both non-human animals and preverbal human infants (e.g., Addessi, Mancini, Crescimbene, Pado-Schioppa, & Visalberghi, 2008; Agrillo, Dadda, Serena, & Bisazza, 2008; Brannon, 2002; Brannon & Terrace, 1998; Cantlon & Brannon, 2006; Carazo, Font, Forteza-Behrendt, & Desfilis, 2009; Hauser, Carey, & Hauser, 2000; Irie-Sugimoto, Kobayashi, Sato, & Hasgawa, 2009; Jaakkola, Fellner, Erb, Rodriguez, & Guarino, 2005; Suanda, Tompson, & Brannon, 2008; see Anderson & Cordes, 2013, for review), only a few studies, primarily with pigeons, have demonstrated nonverbal comprehension of an abstract ordinal rule for temporal quantities (i.e., durations; Dreyfus, Fetterman, Smith, & Stubbs, 1988; Fetterman, 2006; Fetterman & Dreyfus, 1986; Van Rooyen & Santi, 2009). 1 In these studies, pigeons experience the successive presentation of two visual stimuli that vary in duration and are trained to respond on two choice keys based upon the relative duration of the two stimuli.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A subjective shortening effect has repeatedly been found in experimental examinations of temporal comparison and memory for stimulus duration in both humans and nonhumans (e.g., Santi, Hoover, & Simmons, 2011;Spetch & Wilkie, 1983;Van Rooyen & Santi, 2009;Wearden & Ferrara, 1993;Wearden, Goodson, & Foran, 2007;Wearden, Parry, & Stamp, 2002). In the subjective shortening effect, the remembered duration of a stimulus decreases as a function of the delay between presentations of the target and probe stimuli.…”
Section: Simulationmentioning
confidence: 85%