The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2011
DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/22/39/395701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Piezoresistance of top-down suspended Si nanowires

Abstract: Measurements of the gauge factor of suspended, top-down silicon nanowires are presented. The nanowires are fabricated with a CMOS compatible process and with doping concentrations ranging from 2 × 10(20) down to 5 × 10(17) cm(-3). The extracted gauge factors are compared with results on identical non-suspended nanowires and with state-of-the-art results. An increase of the gauge factor after suspension is demonstrated. For the low doped nanowires a value of 235 is measured. Particular attention was paid throug… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

10
39
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
10
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From equations (12) and (13) and the estimations made for the deflection at rest and first-mode vibration amplitude (a 1 E1 nm, d 0 ¼ 5-50 nm), we infer gauge factor values in the range from a few units to a few hundreds. This is the range expected from a conventional piezoresistive effect in SiNWs depending on the doping level 24 . Therefore, high-sensitivity piezoresistive transduction, enhanced by an asymmetric beam profile at rest, does not require extraordinarily large piezoresistive coefficients as those reported on high-resistivity bottom-up NWs, which reach up to 1,000 and above 21 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…From equations (12) and (13) and the estimations made for the deflection at rest and first-mode vibration amplitude (a 1 E1 nm, d 0 ¼ 5-50 nm), we infer gauge factor values in the range from a few units to a few hundreds. This is the range expected from a conventional piezoresistive effect in SiNWs depending on the doping level 24 . Therefore, high-sensitivity piezoresistive transduction, enhanced by an asymmetric beam profile at rest, does not require extraordinarily large piezoresistive coefficients as those reported on high-resistivity bottom-up NWs, which reach up to 1,000 and above 21 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Therefore, high-sensitivity piezoresistive transduction, enhanced by an asymmetric beam profile at rest, does not require extraordinarily large piezoresistive coefficients as those reported on high-resistivity bottom-up NWs, which reach up to 1,000 and above 21 . Nevertheless, larger gauge factors are still expected for bottom-up NWs as compared with their top-down counterparts according to the literature 23,24 . In fact, a larger gauge factor for bottom-up SiNWs explains why the quadratic component of the resistance variation with vibration is only detected for these devices (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8 A lot of excitement was produced by the report of giant piezoresistivity in silicon nanowires, 9,10 with the latest room temperature value reported being G = 280. 11 The earliest work hinting at a higher piezoresistive effect in n-type SiGe alloys of high Ge compositions was performed by R. W. Keyes in 1957. 12 He found a piezoresistive effect 15% larger than in pure Ge at a Ge composition of x = 0.96.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of publications have shown the enhanced sensitivity of silicon piezoresistors [12]- [14]. Overall, the piezoresistance coefficient has been found to increase with decreasing nanowire doping and cross-sectional area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%