1989
DOI: 10.1080/10570318909374312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Piety, propriety, and perspective: An interpretation and application of key terms in Kenneth Burke'spermanence and change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scholars agree that perspective by incongruity is a particularly suitable strategy for exposing transgressions (Dow, 1993;Rosteck & Leff, 1989). In this strategy, a rhetor uses terms characteristic of one domain of experience to "name .…”
Section: Impediments To Public Participationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Scholars agree that perspective by incongruity is a particularly suitable strategy for exposing transgressions (Dow, 1993;Rosteck & Leff, 1989). In this strategy, a rhetor uses terms characteristic of one domain of experience to "name .…”
Section: Impediments To Public Participationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As such, the intertribal powwows of central Ohio are an example of self-assured co-cultural communication (Orbe, 1996;Orbe, 1998) that uses Burke's (1954Burke's ( /1965 concept of "perspective by incongruity" to break down established ideological orientations and replace them with new ones, and thus also a new ideology (see Dow, 1994;Fitch & Mandziuk, 1997;Rosteck & Leff, 1989). Thus, powwows are an important opportunity to negotiate the relationship between American Indian peoples and non-American Indians.…”
Section: Powwow As Cultural Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…187, 194). Rosteck and Leff (1989) examine the rhetoric of another anarchist, Voltairine de Cleyre, focusing on her efforts to redefine the significance of the Haymarket riot. Rosteck and LefFs analysis, however, divorces the rhetoric from audience and context; they argue that Burke's concept allows them "to view an oratorical text as a local achievement without dissolving it into the immediate historical context" (1989, p. 339).…”
Section: Aids and Gay Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%