2009
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.0907.1336
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pieri algebras for the orthogonal and symplectic groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The recent papers [16,17,18] and their sequels construct algebras encoding branching rules of representations of the classical groups, and then study their standard monomial bases and toric degenerations. With a similar philosophy, [19] and [22] study tensor products of representations for the classical groups with explicit highest weight vectors. By degenerating the muti-homogeneous coordinate rings of the flag varieties, [20] and [21] describe weight vectors of the classical groups in terms of the Gelfand-Tsetlin polyhedral cone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent papers [16,17,18] and their sequels construct algebras encoding branching rules of representations of the classical groups, and then study their standard monomial bases and toric degenerations. With a similar philosophy, [19] and [22] study tensor products of representations for the classical groups with explicit highest weight vectors. By degenerating the muti-homogeneous coordinate rings of the flag varieties, [20] and [21] describe weight vectors of the classical groups in terms of the Gelfand-Tsetlin polyhedral cone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We remark that this Hibi algebra structure in branching problems has interesting counterparts in tensor product decomposition problems, which can be explained by reciprocity properties between branchings and tensor products in representation theory. For this direction, we refer readers to [HL07,HKL,KL].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%