1985
DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.114.3.342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Picture perception: Effects of luminance on available information and information-extraction rate.

Abstract: SUMMARYIn each of four experiments, complex visual stimuli--pictures and digit arrays--were remembered better when shown at high luminance than when shown at low luminance. Why does this occur? Two possibilities were considered: first that lowering luminance reduces the amount of available information in the stimulus, and second that lowering luminance reduces the rate at which the information is extracted from the stimulus. Evidence was found for both possibilities. When stimuli were presented at durations sh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
97
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
10
97
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar effects of visual quality on visual search and stimulus identificationhave been observed elsewhere (e.g., Johnsen & Briggs, 1973;Pashler & Badgio, 1985;Schwartz, Pomerantz, & Egeth, 1977). Loftus (1985) presented evidence that the rate with which information is extracted from visual displays is directly influenced by the contrast of the display (the lower the contrast, the lower the information-extraction rate; see Sperling, 1986, for a quantitative model).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Similar effects of visual quality on visual search and stimulus identificationhave been observed elsewhere (e.g., Johnsen & Briggs, 1973;Pashler & Badgio, 1985;Schwartz, Pomerantz, & Egeth, 1977). Loftus (1985) presented evidence that the rate with which information is extracted from visual displays is directly influenced by the contrast of the display (the lower the contrast, the lower the information-extraction rate; see Sperling, 1986, for a quantitative model).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…For instance, factors such as the viewing task (search vs. memorization; Castelhano, Mack, & Henderson, 2009;Nuthmann et al, 2010), the visual characteristics of the stimulus (e.g., luminance, image degradation; Loftus, 1985;Walshe & Nuthmann, 2014), the semantics of the scene (e.g., Henderson, Weeks, & Hollingworth, 1999;Loftus & Mackworth, 1978;Wu, Wick, & Pomplun, 2014), or familiarity (e.g., Althoff & Cohen, 1999) can affect gaze control and FDs. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that visual and cognitive processing demands are associated with differences in FDs.…”
Section: Fds and Saccade Latency In Adultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, it has been shown that restricting or degrading the availability of stimulus information has an effect on fixation durations (Groner, Groner & von Mühlenen, 2008;Loftus, 1985;Loschky, McConkie, Yang & Miller, 2005;Mannan, Ruddock & Wooding, 1995;Parkhurst, Culurciello & Niebur, 2000). More specifically, when spatial frequency information is filtered from scenes (e.g., using a band-pass filter), fixation durations tend to increase.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%