When a single abrupt onset appears in a multielement display, it captures attention. When multiple onset elements occur, they have conditional priority over no-onset elements such that a limited number of onsets can be serviced with high priority in visual search (Yantis & Johnson, 1990). We report three experiments in which we assess two possible mechanisms for attentional prioritization: a priority queue into which a fixed number of high-priority elements are placed for early servicing during search, and a mechanism that temporarily tags all high-priority elements for early servicing or more frequent sampling. We manipulated the visual quality or interletter confusability ofthe stimuli to prolong encoding and/or comparison operations; this manipulation led to a decrease in the estimated number of elements serviced with high priority. We conclude that a mechanism incorporating temporally decaying priority tags is implicated in servicing multiple abrupt onsets in visual search.The complexity of visual perception requires an efficient selection mechanism that constrains the current visual task so that it is momentarily tractable (Tsotsos, 1988). Selective attention sets priorities that are used for a variety of visual tasks, including efficient visual search. For example, the guided search model of Cave and Wolfe (1990) suggests that an activation value is computed for each element in a visual display according to its similarity to the target on several dimensions and its conspicuity in the display (i.e., its dissimilarity to nontarget elements). Elements are then processed serially in order of their activation strengths. Similar models have been advanced by others (e.g., Bundesen, 1990;Duncan & Humphreys, 1989;Koch & Ullman, 1985).These models all include some kind of prioritizing system in which preliminary decisions are made about which stimuli will be processed first (in serial models) or sampled more frequently (in parallel models). In most cases, a distinction is made between bottom-up or stimulusdriven selection, and top-down or goal-directed selection. In the present article, we describe three experiments in which we investigated one aspect of attentional prioritization via stimulus-driven attentional interrupts generated by abrupt visual onsets.This research was supported by National Institute of Mental Health Grant ROI-MH43924 to Steven Yantis. We are grateful to Vibha Thakral and Elizabeth Graham for excellent technical assistance, and to Howard Egeth, Doug Johnson, Jim Johnston, and Toby Mordkoff for valuable suggestions concerning the research. Our thanks to Lester Krueger, John Palmer, and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on an earlier draft of the article. Correspondence should be sent to Steven Yantis, Department of Psychology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218 (e-mail: yantis@jhuvms).
Abrupt Onsets and AttentionSeveral lines of research have provided empirical evidence for attentional capture by abrupt onsets.' For example, Todd and Van Gelder (1979) developed the no...