2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.114644
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Picture fuzzy extension of the CODAS method for multi-criteria vehicle shredding facility location

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the fuzzy CODAS technique that is a part of the proposed integrated fuzzy model is a novel multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach, it has been observed that it has been applied in some studies for solving decision-making problems in various fields. For example; evaluation of IT technology alternatives for a university (Dahooie et al, 2020), evaluation of environmental quality (Ouhibi & Frikha, 2020), the selection of vehicle shredding facility location (Simic et al, 2021), evaluation of renewable energy alternatives , evaluation of personnel selection problem (Yalçın & Pehlivan, 2019), market segment evaluation (Keshavarz Ghorabaee et al, 2016a). The number of studies using the F-CODAS technique is very limited and none of these papers dealt with decision-making problems encountered in the field of logistics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the fuzzy CODAS technique that is a part of the proposed integrated fuzzy model is a novel multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach, it has been observed that it has been applied in some studies for solving decision-making problems in various fields. For example; evaluation of IT technology alternatives for a university (Dahooie et al, 2020), evaluation of environmental quality (Ouhibi & Frikha, 2020), the selection of vehicle shredding facility location (Simic et al, 2021), evaluation of renewable energy alternatives , evaluation of personnel selection problem (Yalçın & Pehlivan, 2019), market segment evaluation (Keshavarz Ghorabaee et al, 2016a). The number of studies using the F-CODAS technique is very limited and none of these papers dealt with decision-making problems encountered in the field of logistics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In literature, various other MCDM methods such as Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS; Keshavarz Ghorabaee et al, 2015Ghorabaee et al, , 2016Ghorabaee et al, , 2017aGhorabaee et al, , 2018, Combinative Distance-based Assessment (CODAS; Simic et al, 2021), Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS; Karagoz et al, 2021), and measurement of alternatives and ranking according to compromise solution (MARCOS; Pamucar, Iordache, et al, 2020) exist. However, there are multiple advantages of adopted MCDM methods within this study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the production of fuzzy sets, another useful tool to handle imprecise information, called the rough set model, was developed by Pawlak [24], in 1982. Both the fuzzy set theory and rough set theory have the limitation that they are unable to handle parameterized values, thus are not effective in situations considering opinions based on different parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With a different perspective, Sahu et al [ 13 ] utilized a hybridized distance measure based on the theories of PFSs and rough sets for the career selection of students. For more important terminologies related to PFSs, the readers may refer to [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%