2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-11889-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pictorial Law

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 26. The same point is stressed by Boehme-Neßler (2011): ‘Both purely textual and purely visual communication each have their weaknesses. But both complement each other in many ways, and can compensate for each other’s weaknesses’ (p. 87).…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“… 26. The same point is stressed by Boehme-Neßler (2011): ‘Both purely textual and purely visual communication each have their weaknesses. But both complement each other in many ways, and can compensate for each other’s weaknesses’ (p. 87).…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…For instance, are linguistic rules and graphic rules interchangeable, or is something lost in translation between one medium and the other; 15 if so, is it a question of ‘contents’ or ‘impact’? It is usually stressed that images have an evocative, emotional force (in general, see Boehme-Neßler, 2011; as regards drawings and designs in plans, see Van Dijk, 2011, and Ivory, 2013) that can be lost if we translate them into conventional linguistic terms. But is this ‘evocative force’ a really crucial issue for rules ?…”
Section: Four Main Questions On Graphic Rules: Logics Semantics Pramentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations