“…A difference – more relevant than the evocative force – is that drawings are better in communicating lots of information simultaneously in a compact form (a map, for instance, can easily conjoin information about the location of objects and their properties), while sentential systems are better in dissecting and manipulating abstract concepts (Camp, 2007). As a consequence, even if images and sentences can in principle be translated from one into the other and vice versa, something may be lost in the translation (Boehme-Neßler, 2011; Dudek, 2015; Sober, 1976). On the one hand, as Elliott Sober (1976) writes, The expressive power of analog pictorial representations extends beyond that of language, which contains at best a countable infinity of distinct representations … Hence, not all pictorial systems are reducible to impoverished linguistic systems of a certain kind.
…”