2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PI-RADS Prostate Imaging – Reporting and Data System: 2015, Version 2

Abstract: The Prostate Imaging - Reporting and Data System Version 2 (PI-RADS™ v2) is the product of an international collaboration of the American College of Radiology (ACR), European Society of Uroradiology (ESUR), and AdMetech Foundation. It is designed to promote global standardization and diminish variation in the acquisition, interpretation, and reporting of prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) examination, and it is based on the best available evidence and expert consensus opinion. It estab… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

28
2,316
8
41

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,468 publications
(2,393 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
28
2,316
8
41
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, however, there has been a lack of qualitative reproducibility that would make a prostate MRI finding more reliable for the referring physician [24]. The joint recommendations of the American College of Radiology (ACR), the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) and the AdmeTech Foundation regarding performance of MP-MRI of the prostate as well as standardized findings (PI-RADS v2) are an important step towards an international standard which can strengthen the trust of the referring physicians in the method [12]. In the German-speaking realm, one step in this direction includes, among other things, current standardized implementation and protocol recommendations for prostate MRI [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To date, however, there has been a lack of qualitative reproducibility that would make a prostate MRI finding more reliable for the referring physician [24]. The joint recommendations of the American College of Radiology (ACR), the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) and the AdmeTech Foundation regarding performance of MP-MRI of the prostate as well as standardized findings (PI-RADS v2) are an important step towards an international standard which can strengthen the trust of the referring physicians in the method [12]. In the German-speaking realm, one step in this direction includes, among other things, current standardized implementation and protocol recommendations for prostate MRI [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2015 in the course of increasing standardization of MRI of the prostate, a collaboration of the American College of Radiology (ACR), the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) and the Adme Tech Foundation published joint recommendations for performing MP-MRI of the prostate as well as standardized reporting (Prostate Imaging -Reporting and Data System Version 2 -PI-RADS v2) [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All scans were re-reviewed and evaluated by a single radiologist with prostate MRI experience, for 2 key purposes: (1) to ensure consistent results given that operatordependent heterogeneity may exist, and (2) to take into consideration the PI-RADs 2.0 scoring system that was established in November 2014 (11). Lesions from the first scan were identified as either index, or non-index lesions.…”
Section: Multiparametric Mrimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reduce these artifacts, patients should be required to empty the rectum and bladder prior to examination. If significant air in the rectum is detected in the planning sequences, decompression of the rectum via a rectal tube can be advantageous [12]. Enemas or laxatives should not be administered since these increase intestinal peristalsis and can intensify artifacts.…”
Section: Antispasmodicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, T2w imaging is the most important sequence for detecting carcinomas in the transitional zone. The differentiation criterion here is primarily the architectural distortion followed by size [12]. Morphological T2w sequences are decisive for determining the location of focal lesions.…”
Section: Morphological T2w Tse/fse Sequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%