IET Irish Signals and Systems Conference (ISSC 2006) 2006
DOI: 10.1049/cp:20060431
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PI and PID controller tuning rules: an overview and personal perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For this purpose, a preliminary identification test is needed to be executed on the pilot plant to extract its dynamic model in the context of FOPDT structure. Reaction-curve technique represents the simplest approach to estimate such a model structure using a simple step excitation in open loop system configuration [27]. A large step test might be required to achieve a desired signal to noise ratio (SNR) [28] in industrial environments.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Auto-tuning Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, a preliminary identification test is needed to be executed on the pilot plant to extract its dynamic model in the context of FOPDT structure. Reaction-curve technique represents the simplest approach to estimate such a model structure using a simple step excitation in open loop system configuration [27]. A large step test might be required to achieve a desired signal to noise ratio (SNR) [28] in industrial environments.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Auto-tuning Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, Equation (9) shows that the pressure at the output of the MPR, is a function of the net force acting orifice restriction, initiated by the force applied mechanically. The variable 2 in Equation (2), is a function of this regulated pressure that enables the regulator to maintain a regulated pressure.…”
Section: Model Of Actuation Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimation of the PID controller gains were achieved using the reaction of the process to a step input signal, a method proposed by Nichols-Zeigler [8], [9], [12], [22]- [24].The gains determined from the process reaction (Fig. 9) are used as a start point to tune an automatic controller of the form shown in Equation (11), for the control of the nozzle emulator model.…”
Section: Automatic Controller Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the continuous time PID controller is expressed in the Laplace domain as q 2 (s) = K P 1 + 1 Tis + T d s , where K P is the proportional gain, T i and T d are the integral and derivative time constants. Furthermore, many process control problems also contain a time delay τ m (see O'Dwyer, 2006;Morarescu, Mendez-Barrios, Niculescu & Gu, 2011). These include proportional plus delay q 3 (s), integrator plus delay model q 4 (s), first order lag plus delay q 5 (s), first order lag plus integral plus delay q 6 (s) expressed below: If in the expression of q 3 (s) there are two different gains for the two terms, then we obtain the proportional retarded controller: q 7 (s) = K p + K r e −sτm .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%