Abstract:ABSTRACT:The objective of this study was to evaluate the production and persistence of biomass of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum), guinea grass (Panicum maximum) and palisade grass (Urochloa brizantha), as well as the release rate of macronutrients and Si and changes in cellulose, lignin and the C/N and C/Si ratios of biomass. The experimental design was a randomized block design, with four replications, in a factorial constituted by three cover crops (pearl millet, guinea grass and palisade grass) and six s… Show more
“…Urochloa can accumulate between 2 and 16 Mg of dry matter ha −1 in their aerial parts, per year, in crop rotation or intercropping (Macedo, 2009;Bernardes et al, 2010;Costa et al, 2016;São Miguel et al, 2018), with the amount varying according to the species and the system management practices adopted, such as fertilization and cutting timing/frequency.…”
Section: Shoot Biomass and Nutrient Accumulation In Urochloamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Costa et al (2014b), it takes 6 months for 90% of all P and K and 60% of all N to be released from the Urochloa residue. To release half of the N, P, K, Ca, and Mg contents of the Urochloa biomass, it takes 52, 20, 16, 61, and 47 days, respectively (Costa et al, 2016). In corn-Urochloa intercrop, up to 89% of U. brizantha and U. ruziziensis residues were already decomposed 3 months after corn harvest (Momesso et al, 2019).…”
Section: Decomposition Of Urochloa Residues and Nutrient Releasementioning
Increasing biodiversity is an important issue in more secure and sustainable agriculture. Diversified systems are more resilient to climate change, environmental stresses and enhance soil health, nutrient cycling and nutrient use efficiency. In tropical agroecosystems, cover crops and intercrops are an alternative toward a more diverse and sustainable production. Urochloa spp. (syn. Brachiaria spp.) are perennial grasses, known for their high biomass production. They are commonly used as cover and companion crops in conservation agriculture in the tropics and the residues left in the field after cutting protect the soil and provide nutrient to the next crop cycle or intercropped culture. Urochloa species roots are vigorous, abundant and deep, as opposed to the more shallow and scarce roots of common crops. These traits contribute to carbon sequestration, soil organic matter stabilization and nutrient cycling. Urochloa roots also improve soil physical characteristics and influence soil nutrient dynamics, reducing nutrient losses and enhancing cycling, what is key to achieve greater nutrient use efficiency in agriculture. For instance, Urochloa root exudates can reduce nitrogen losses by denitrification and leaching through a process called biological nitrification inhibition; root exudates can mobilize recalcitrant phosphorus from soils and make it available for plant uptake; the deep roots of these grasses have the potential to recover nutrients that are virtually lost away from the root zone of other crops. This review compiles scientific progress regarding the introduction of Urochloa in agroecosystems, mainly on the aspects related to the contribution to more secure and sustainable agriculture.
“…Urochloa can accumulate between 2 and 16 Mg of dry matter ha −1 in their aerial parts, per year, in crop rotation or intercropping (Macedo, 2009;Bernardes et al, 2010;Costa et al, 2016;São Miguel et al, 2018), with the amount varying according to the species and the system management practices adopted, such as fertilization and cutting timing/frequency.…”
Section: Shoot Biomass and Nutrient Accumulation In Urochloamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Costa et al (2014b), it takes 6 months for 90% of all P and K and 60% of all N to be released from the Urochloa residue. To release half of the N, P, K, Ca, and Mg contents of the Urochloa biomass, it takes 52, 20, 16, 61, and 47 days, respectively (Costa et al, 2016). In corn-Urochloa intercrop, up to 89% of U. brizantha and U. ruziziensis residues were already decomposed 3 months after corn harvest (Momesso et al, 2019).…”
Section: Decomposition Of Urochloa Residues and Nutrient Releasementioning
Increasing biodiversity is an important issue in more secure and sustainable agriculture. Diversified systems are more resilient to climate change, environmental stresses and enhance soil health, nutrient cycling and nutrient use efficiency. In tropical agroecosystems, cover crops and intercrops are an alternative toward a more diverse and sustainable production. Urochloa spp. (syn. Brachiaria spp.) are perennial grasses, known for their high biomass production. They are commonly used as cover and companion crops in conservation agriculture in the tropics and the residues left in the field after cutting protect the soil and provide nutrient to the next crop cycle or intercropped culture. Urochloa species roots are vigorous, abundant and deep, as opposed to the more shallow and scarce roots of common crops. These traits contribute to carbon sequestration, soil organic matter stabilization and nutrient cycling. Urochloa roots also improve soil physical characteristics and influence soil nutrient dynamics, reducing nutrient losses and enhancing cycling, what is key to achieve greater nutrient use efficiency in agriculture. For instance, Urochloa root exudates can reduce nitrogen losses by denitrification and leaching through a process called biological nitrification inhibition; root exudates can mobilize recalcitrant phosphorus from soils and make it available for plant uptake; the deep roots of these grasses have the potential to recover nutrients that are virtually lost away from the root zone of other crops. This review compiles scientific progress regarding the introduction of Urochloa in agroecosystems, mainly on the aspects related to the contribution to more secure and sustainable agriculture.
“…The maximum N release rate from palisade grass is observed from 0 to 14 days (Fig. 3) after desiccation (Costa et al, 2016a). In black oats, most of the N in plant residues is released up to 34 days after desiccation and is faster than C mineralization (Crusciol et al, 2008).…”
Despite the significant inroads into increasing agricultural productivity in recent decades, nitrogen remains a key limiting factor for crop growth and yield. Though highly variable globally, the amount of reactive N added yearly onto cropland that is subsequently lost to the environment remains high. As such the interest in agronomic approaches to address this and improve nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) is currently very high. Here, we have shown the combined approaches of management interventions such as no-till, intercropping with leguminous and grass species, use of nitrogen inhibitors, and combined crop-livestock systems offer considerable potential for enhancing NUE and are already being readily deployed in the tropics. Grass species such as Brachiaria in particular have demonstrated enormous potential via their deep root architectures to reduce losses by leaching. However, the potential for increases in NUE through interaction and association of the root systems with the soil microbial community via rhizodeposits remains a major area for future research. Increasingly it is recognized that truly enhancing NUE requires consideration of the whole system. Improving
“…In the present study, forages sown in succession to maize showed lower lignin content and C/N ratios due to the younger age of the grasses, a strong indication that this plant material is capable of decomposing more quickly, cycling nutrients and improving soil quality (Costa et al, 2016b). The high production of remaining straw from guinea grass sown in succession to maize enabled greater accumulation of nutrients that can potentially return to the soil.…”
Section: Remaining Straw and Nutrient Contentmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…The remaining straw (mulch) in NTS contributes to soil quality and protection and to nutrient cycling (Crusciol et al, 2015;Costa et al, 2016b;Pariz et al, 2017). For successful implementation of NTS in the tropics, sufficient remaining straw production is key for maintaining favorable conditions for successive planting, as straw is a slow-release source of nutrients for cash crops (Costa et al, 2016b). In contrast to the FDMP results, the amount of remaining straw was highest for guinea grass sown in succession to maize (9.8 Mg ha −1 ).…”
Section: Remaining Straw and Nutrient Contentmentioning
In tropical regions, intercropping systems under no-tillage improve biomass quantity, soil conservation, and cash crop productivity. However, the optimal sowing time for forage species in these cropping systems is unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of two sowing times of palisade and guinea grass on forage production and quality, soybean yield and soil chemical properties. Palisade and guinea grasses were sown for intercropping with maize or after maize silage harvest (hereafter succession) in an experiment carried out over three crop seasons. We evaluated forage dry matter production, pasture nutritive values, straw nutrient content, soybean leaf nutrients, yield, and soil fertility. The highest dry matter production was 8.1 Mg ha −1 for guinea grass in the intercropping system (sum of 3 cuts). Sowing forage after maize silage harvest provided 4% more crude protein compared with intercropping, regardless of grass species. Soybean yield was over 1.0 Mg ha −1 higher when soybean was cropped in succession compared with intercropping; however, the effects of the two forage grasses on soybean production were similar. Soil pH, calcium and magnesium content, cation exchange capacity, and base saturation were higher in the intercropping systems than in the succession systems, particularly when guinea grass was cultivated. Sowing guinea grass after maize harvest provided better forage quality, nutrient cycling, soybean yields, and soil chemical properties in tropical conditions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.