2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejps.2009.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physiologically based mechanistic modelling to predict complex drug–drug interactions involving simultaneous competitive and time-dependent enzyme inhibition by parent compound and its metabolite in both liver and gut—The effect of diltiazem on the time-course of exposure to triazolam

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
103
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
4
103
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Increasingly, however, it is accepted that there are several limitations (such as the appropriate selection of [I] (Rowland et al, 2006)) associated with the use of classical extrapolation of in vitro data when assessing mDDIs that preclude sensible assessment of the clinical relevance of novel interactions. Indeed, the substantial benefits of mechanistic (PBPK) extrapolation of mDDI assessments have been extensively reported and adopted (Sheiner and Steimer, 2000; Danhof et al, 2008; Rowland Yeo et al, 2010; Rowland et al, 2011) and this approach is recommended for the preclinical assessment of mDDIs for regulatory review (Zhao et al, 2011; FDA, 2012). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Increasingly, however, it is accepted that there are several limitations (such as the appropriate selection of [I] (Rowland et al, 2006)) associated with the use of classical extrapolation of in vitro data when assessing mDDIs that preclude sensible assessment of the clinical relevance of novel interactions. Indeed, the substantial benefits of mechanistic (PBPK) extrapolation of mDDI assessments have been extensively reported and adopted (Sheiner and Steimer, 2000; Danhof et al, 2008; Rowland Yeo et al, 2010; Rowland et al, 2011) and this approach is recommended for the preclinical assessment of mDDIs for regulatory review (Zhao et al, 2011; FDA, 2012). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differential equations used by the simulator describing enzyme kinetics and the impact of co-variates have been described previously (Rowland Yeo et al, 2010). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to a 'full' PBPK model in which organs and tissues are separately represented, a 'semi' PBPK model combines tissues having similar drug partitioning and distribution equilibrium with the plasma compartment [12]. These semi-PBPK models have been utilized to study the dynamics or time-based characteristics of drug-drug interactions [13][14][15]. A semi-PBPK model was also constructed for erythromycin.…”
Section: General Pbpk Model Buildingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, they have been used to evaluate aspects of experimental design including dosage, choice of dosage form, and the timing of dosage of interacting compounds (153,154). These models also have been used to assess more complex scenarios involving simultaneous dose-dependent inhibition and induction (124,155) as well as competition for plasma binding, the inhibitory effects of both parent drug and metabolites (149,156,157) (Figure 7), the lack of adherence, and multiple DDIs. The latter are a particular regulatory concern and impose prohibitive limitations on in vivo studies to cover the various permutations of combinations.…”
Section: Prediction Of Drug-drug Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 98%