2020
DOI: 10.3390/plants9020194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physiological Response of Miscanthus x giganteus to Plant Growth Regulators in Nutritionally Poor Soil

Abstract: Miscanthus x giganteus (Mxg) is a promising second-generation biofuel crop with high production of energetic biomass. Our aim was to determine the level of plant stress of Mxg grown in poor quality soils using non-invasive physiological parameters and to test whether the stress could be reduced by application of plant growth regulators (PGRs). Plant fitness was quantified by measuring of leaf fluorescence using 24 indexes to select the most suitable fluorescence indicators for quantification of this type of ab… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
2
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…F v /F m ratio in the present research was observed from 0.777 to 0.799. This parameter, expressing the maximum efficiency of PSII photochemistry in dark-adapted leaves, has been usually reported between 0.79 and 0.85 in unstressed plants (Chojak-Kozniewska et al 2018;Malinská et al 2020). Nevertheless, it is proved that F v /F m ratio is less sensitive and responsive to the stresses in comparison with the effective quantum yield of PSII (Y(II)) (Malinská et al 2020), especially to the mild stress conditions (Salvatori et al 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…F v /F m ratio in the present research was observed from 0.777 to 0.799. This parameter, expressing the maximum efficiency of PSII photochemistry in dark-adapted leaves, has been usually reported between 0.79 and 0.85 in unstressed plants (Chojak-Kozniewska et al 2018;Malinská et al 2020). Nevertheless, it is proved that F v /F m ratio is less sensitive and responsive to the stresses in comparison with the effective quantum yield of PSII (Y(II)) (Malinská et al 2020), especially to the mild stress conditions (Salvatori et al 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This parameter, expressing the maximum efficiency of PSII photochemistry in dark-adapted leaves, has been usually reported between 0.79 and 0.85 in unstressed plants (Chojak-Kozniewska et al 2018;Malinská et al 2020). Nevertheless, it is proved that F v /F m ratio is less sensitive and responsive to the stresses in comparison with the effective quantum yield of PSII (Y(II)) (Malinská et al 2020), especially to the mild stress conditions (Salvatori et al 2017). In fact, the ChlF originates from de-excitation of the first excited singlet-state of Chla molecules (Roháček 2002) and has a significant correlation with Chl content (Yaghoubi Khanghahi et al 2019a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For most plant species, the optimal values of Fv/Fm range from 0.79 to 0.84, reduced values indicate plant stress [16]. Also, Malinská et al [25] report that measuring leaf fluorescence can be a useful tool for detecting plant stress in vivo. They assessed the Fv/Fm parameter and the performance index on M. x giganteus leaves and considered these parameters to be a suitable method for identifying significant plant stress, but they add that other indexes may detect some minor changes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Аналогічні дані були отримані після обробки міскантусу двома стимуляторами росту рослин Стімпо і Регоплант (Malinská et al, 2020). Усі регулятори росту рослин містять різні сполуки та екстракти, які стимулюють розвиток рослин (Verma, Ravindran, & Kumar, 2016;Schmidt et al, 2017).…”
Section: обговоренняunclassified