2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physiological, psychological and behavioral consequences of activating autobiographical memories

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
28
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A third novel finding was that for both food preference and behavior intention, positive suggestions (loved the food the first time you tried it) had a stronger effect than did negative suggestions (got sick from the food). This finding is consistent with the limited research on false autobiographical belief and memory formation for positive versus negative events (see Mantonakis, Wudarzewski, Bernstein, Clifasefi, & Loftus, 2013; see also Kuwabara & Pillemer, 2010;Pezdek & Salim, 2011 for differences between true positive and negative memories). Specifically, it may be easier to convince people that they experienced a positive rather than a negative event in the past (Mantonakis et al, 2013), because memories for positive and negative experiences may serve different functions (Pillemer, 2009;see Bluck, Alea, Habermas, & Rubin, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A third novel finding was that for both food preference and behavior intention, positive suggestions (loved the food the first time you tried it) had a stronger effect than did negative suggestions (got sick from the food). This finding is consistent with the limited research on false autobiographical belief and memory formation for positive versus negative events (see Mantonakis, Wudarzewski, Bernstein, Clifasefi, & Loftus, 2013; see also Kuwabara & Pillemer, 2010;Pezdek & Salim, 2011 for differences between true positive and negative memories). Specifically, it may be easier to convince people that they experienced a positive rather than a negative event in the past (Mantonakis et al, 2013), because memories for positive and negative experiences may serve different functions (Pillemer, 2009;see Bluck, Alea, Habermas, & Rubin, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…It is possible that positive suggestions are more effective than negative suggestions. For example, true positive autobiographical memories influence intentions and behavior more so than true negative autobiographical memories (Kuwabara & Pillemer, 2010;Pezdek & Salim, 2011). Presumably the same should hold for objectively false beliefs or memories, because these are subjectively believed to be genuine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in studies investigating how believed memories impact behavior, participants exhibited superior public speaking performance and higher levels of exercise if believed memories of relevant positive experiences were activated (see Biondolillo & Pillemer, 2015;Pezdek & Salim, 2011). However, because these 'memories' were both believed and recollected, it is hard to know whether it was recollection, belief, or both that were responsible for the changes in subsequent behavior.…”
Section: Undermining Belief In False Memories Leads To Less Efficientmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regardless of veracity, the detail with which events are remembered can meaningfully inform decisionmaking and behavior. Indeed, there are some examples of a link between memory and behavior in the broader literature on autobiographical memory, where the critical feature is the memory representation rather than the truthfulness of the memory (e.g., memories of getting sick from egg salad leads to a decrease in egg salad preference and consumption; Geraerts et al, 2008; see also Pezdek & Salim, 2011;Scoboria, Mazzoni, & Jarry, 2008). Future research is necessary to determine whether and how a memory-behavior link scales to significantly emotionally charged public events and costly action with important implications for promoting collective welfare in the aftermath of disaster.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%