SAE Technical Paper Series 2001
DOI: 10.4271/2001-01-2165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physiological Effects of A Mechanical Counter Pressure Glove

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1a), but the concept was tabled due to limitations in available materials, user discomfort, funding, and donning and doffing challenges 6 . More recent research efforts to advance MCP suit design have been conducted at multiple universities, including at the University of San Diego and in the Man Vehicle Laboratory (MVL) at MIT 5,[7][8][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] . The MIT BioSuit™ system (see Fig.…”
Section: Mechanical Counter-pressure History and Design Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1a), but the concept was tabled due to limitations in available materials, user discomfort, funding, and donning and doffing challenges 6 . More recent research efforts to advance MCP suit design have been conducted at multiple universities, including at the University of San Diego and in the Man Vehicle Laboratory (MVL) at MIT 5,[7][8][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] . The MIT BioSuit™ system (see Fig.…”
Section: Mechanical Counter-pressure History and Design Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This group subsequently developed a full elastic sleeve for the arm that produced a higher pressure of 31 kPa at the finger, dorsum, and wrist, but only 21 kPa at the forearm and upper arm. Despite this wide pressure range, again the sleeve prevented adverse changes for underpressures of up to -20 kPa for 5 minutes [8,9,10].…”
Section: Mcp Glovesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…function [h,r,strain,w,f,mark,wcircum]=band_determine (zcoord,circum,x,y,knee,max) %This function actually does the calculations to produce the calibratied %bands %The following 2 lines need to be changed if a single wrap or double wrap %or triple wrap is being used pressure_perlayer=15; %7.5 kPa is 2 double wraps (ie the cut and paste for the dummies) %15 is a normal double wrap %30 is a single wrap %10 is a triple wrap width_factor=1/2; %1/3 for triple wrap %1/2 for double wrap %for single wrap change this to 5 mm, and remove the necessary code as %shown below, noted by the ****** h(1)=40; % start 40 mm above ankle r(1)=circum(2)/2/pi; % start at 4 cm above the ankle to calculate the radius based on the % circumference mark(1,1:7)=0; mark (1,8)=circum(2)/10; %Note this outputs in cm % the first part of the wrap is to go over the leg, and then the second % layer is actually used to create the pressure w(1)=0;%want to wrap over immediately f(1)=0; n=2; %start with the 2nd mark, which is 4 cm above the ankle while h(n-1)< max h(n)=h(n-1)+width_factor*w(n-1); %****** %h(n)=h(n-1_+width_factor; %this is only for single wrap for m=1:length(circum)-1 %loops through to find the right circumference to use if h(n)<zcoord(m) break end end ratio=(circum(m)-circum(m-1))/(zcoord(m)-zcoord(m-1)); wcircum(n)=ratio*(h(n)-zcoord(m))+circum(m); %calculates circumference of actual cross-section using interpolation r(n)=wcircum(n)/2/pi; %radius of actual cross-section FperW(n)=pressure_perlayer*r(n)/1000; %make sure in N/mm as above %15 kPa indicates double wrap, 30 kPa indicates single, 7.5 kPa %indicates two double wraps, etc. strain(n)=x(1)*FperW(n)^3+x(2)*FperW(n)^2+x(3)*FperW(n); %calculates strain using FperW w(n)=y(1)*FperW(n)^2+y(2)*FperW(n)+y(3); %material width f(n)=FperW(n)*w(n); %actual force to be used on the material %outputs to check if this is reasonable for the investigator n=n+1; end prev_mark=mark (1,8) [h,r,strain,w,f,mark,wcircum]=thigh_down_wrap (zcoord,circum,x,y,knee,max) %This function actually does the calculations to produce the calibratied %bands %The following 2 lines need to be changed if a single wrap or double wrap %or triple wrap is being used pressure_perlayer=15; %7.5 kPa is 2 double wraps (ie the cut and paste for the dummies) %15 is a normal double wrap %30 is a single wrap %10 is a triple wrap width_factor=1/2; %1/3 for triple wrap %1/2 for double wrap %for single wrap change this to 5 mm, and remove the necessary code as %shown below, noted by the ****** h(1)=40; % start 40 mm above ankle r(1)=circum(2)/2/pi; % start at 4 cm above the ankle to calculate the radius based on the % circumference mark(1,1:7)=0; mark (1,8)=circum(2)/10; %Note this outputs in cm % the first part of the wrap is to go over the leg, and then the second % layer is actually used to create the pressure w(1)=0;%want to wrap over immediately f(1)=0; n=2; while h(n-1)>40 % set at 40 to ensure we use circum (1) which is at 20 mm, and the width of the material is slightly less than 20 mm too h(n)=h(n-1)-width_factor*w(n-1); %here we are wrapping down ****** %h(n)=h(n-1)-width_factor; for m=1:length(circum)-1 %loops through to find the right circumference to use if h(n)>zcoord(m) break end end %m ratio=(circum(m)-circum(m-1))/(zcoord(m)-zcoord(m-1)); wcircum(n)=ratio*...…”
Section: Markers(i-numcols)coord(1) Markers(i+1-2*numcols)coord(1) mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations