2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11099-018-0801-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physiological changes and growth promotion induced in poplar seedlings by the plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria Bacillus subtilis JS

Abstract: This study aimed to determine the effects of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria Bacillus subtilis JS on the growth and physiological changes of Populus euramericana and Populus deltoides × P. nigra. Poplar seedlings were treated with B. subtilis JS and their growth was monitored for up to 120 d. Three different types of treatments [control, B1 (B. subtilis:double-distilled water, 1:100, v/v), and B2 (1:50)] were established. B. subtilis JS enhanced seedling height by 62% and total biomass by 37% after 120 d.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the inoculation with A. brasilense provided an increase of increase of 10.% for biomass P uptake (40.37 to 44.42 kg ha −1 ) and 21.3% for grain P uptake (49.87 to 60.50 kg ha −1 , respectively) compared to control, regardless of P 2 O 5 application rates. The exact mechanisms underlying the B. subtilis and A. brasilense effect on corn growth was not evaluated in the present study, however, it is very likely that the improvement in P availability and uptake reflecting on improved PUE and grain yield by corn verified in this study is associated with the well-known ability of A. brasilense and B. subtilis to promote plant growth (Fukami et al, 2017;Jang et al, 2018;Martins et al, 2018;Posada et al, 2018;Salvo et al, 2018). The increase on PUE and corn yield as a function B. subtilis and A. brasilense inoculation compared to control was, on average, equivalent to 100.5 and 54.6% for PUE and 17.4 and 12.8% for grain yield, respectively, regardless of P 2 O 5 application rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Also, the inoculation with A. brasilense provided an increase of increase of 10.% for biomass P uptake (40.37 to 44.42 kg ha −1 ) and 21.3% for grain P uptake (49.87 to 60.50 kg ha −1 , respectively) compared to control, regardless of P 2 O 5 application rates. The exact mechanisms underlying the B. subtilis and A. brasilense effect on corn growth was not evaluated in the present study, however, it is very likely that the improvement in P availability and uptake reflecting on improved PUE and grain yield by corn verified in this study is associated with the well-known ability of A. brasilense and B. subtilis to promote plant growth (Fukami et al, 2017;Jang et al, 2018;Martins et al, 2018;Posada et al, 2018;Salvo et al, 2018). The increase on PUE and corn yield as a function B. subtilis and A. brasilense inoculation compared to control was, on average, equivalent to 100.5 and 54.6% for PUE and 17.4 and 12.8% for grain yield, respectively, regardless of P 2 O 5 application rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…1), in good agreement with the findings of Grzesik et al 44 . The increase in cotton biomass is because biochar and biofertilizer contain a large number of nutritive elements which can provide a favorable growth environment for plants 45,46 . In this study, the cotton root was the main site of enrichment site for Cd uptake and the cotton stem and boll had the lowest accumulation of Cd, in line with the results of Chen et al 47 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 ), in good agreement with the findings of Grzesik et al 44 . The increase in cotton biomass is because biochar and biofertilizer contain a large number of nutritive elements which can provide a favorable growth environment for plants 45 , 46 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carotenoids, as well as chlorophylls, are photosynthesis pigments; however, their functionality in plants is somewhat different [61]. While they both participate in photosynthesis, increases in chlorophyll content are usually linked with the enhancement of plant viability [57,62] (even linking it to bacterial nitrogen fixation or siderophore production in bacteria-plant interaction studies [63,64]), while carotenoids are linked with plant stress, antioxidative activity and phytohormone production [65][66][67][68][69].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%