2017
DOI: 10.5897/ajar2016.11663
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physiological aspects in cotton cultivars in response to application leaf gibberellic acid

Abstract: The cotton plant is a species of the Malvaceae family and is relevant to the Brazilian and world economy, mainly because of the textile fiber. However, there was an increase in cotton production because it is necessary for the use of inputs or stimulants, such as the use of gibberellic acid, which has contributed in improving the physiological processes of plants. The

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
(12 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, foliar application of GA 3 at 200 ppm produced the highest amount of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and carotenoids which were statistically similar to 300 ppm of GA 3 . These results are supported by several studies reporting that GA 3 enhanced the photosynthetic pigments in V. radiata (Mubeen et al, 2014;Baliah et al, 2018;El Karamany et al, 2019) as well as other crops like wheat (Pazuki et al, 2013), cotton (Onanuga et al, 2012;Firmino da Costa et al, 2017), Euphorbia lathyris (Garg and Kumar, 2012), Aloe barbadensis Data are presented as mean ± SE (n = 3). Data followed by same letter are not significantly different by DMRT test at p < 0.05, CV, Co-efficient of variation.…”
Section: Photosynthetic Pigmentssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…However, foliar application of GA 3 at 200 ppm produced the highest amount of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and carotenoids which were statistically similar to 300 ppm of GA 3 . These results are supported by several studies reporting that GA 3 enhanced the photosynthetic pigments in V. radiata (Mubeen et al, 2014;Baliah et al, 2018;El Karamany et al, 2019) as well as other crops like wheat (Pazuki et al, 2013), cotton (Onanuga et al, 2012;Firmino da Costa et al, 2017), Euphorbia lathyris (Garg and Kumar, 2012), Aloe barbadensis Data are presented as mean ± SE (n = 3). Data followed by same letter are not significantly different by DMRT test at p < 0.05, CV, Co-efficient of variation.…”
Section: Photosynthetic Pigmentssupporting
confidence: 74%