2017
DOI: 10.1249/mss.0000000000001083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physiological Adaptations to Sprint Interval Training with Matched Exercise Volume

Abstract: The higher incremental aerobic performance and lower skinfold thickness in HIIT60s versus HIIT10s reflected similar adaptations, but the higher repeated sprint performance was observed only in responses to HIIT60s, which may elicit greater anaerobic adaptations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two further excluded studies were non-RCTs 59 60. Three studies61–63 tested two HIIT protocols against the same group of MICT participants, hence after screening, a total of 29 data sets from 26 studies24 25 58 61–82 met the stated inclusion criteria.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two further excluded studies were non-RCTs 59 60. Three studies61–63 tested two HIIT protocols against the same group of MICT participants, hence after screening, a total of 29 data sets from 26 studies24 25 58 61–82 met the stated inclusion criteria.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HIIT refers to physical activity characterized by relatively brief bursts of vigorous activity (i.e., ~90% of maximal aerobic power for brief intervals), interspersed by short periods of rest or low-intensity physical activity for recovery (Eddolls et al, 2017). It has been suggested that HIIT, typically studied using treadmill running or cycling on an ergometer (Eddolls et al, 2017), may be an attractive alternative to traditional moderateintensity continuous exercise or resistance exercise as a means of promoting various health outcomes, such as aerobic capacity (Lee, Hsu et al, 2018), lipid metabolism (Lee, Kuo et al, 2018), vascular function (O'Brien et al, 2020), and balance (Jiménez-García et al, 2019). Although HIIT may be associated with higher risk of injury (Rynecki et al, 2019), its health-related benefits can be manifested once implemented appropriately.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence suggests that short-term cycle ergometer interval training interventions (≤4 weeks) improve physiological markers associated with health (e.g., skeletal muscle oxidative capacity and VO 2max ) in male undergraduate students [ 13 , 22 , 23 ]. The effects of cycle ergometer interval training on body composition have also been reported [ 24 ], with a report of lower body fat percentage following 12 cycle-ergometer interval training sessions [ 24 ]. Nevertheless, the metabolic demands of the exercise modalities are different in cycling compared to running [ 25 ]; thus, previous findings cannot be generalized to run interval training (RIT).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%