2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2016.11.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physiochemical charge stabilization of silver nanoparticles and its antibacterial applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
26
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Obviously, the plasmon peak was observed at 404 nm ( figure 2(d)) indicating the presence of nanosized Ag particles, which is in accordance with the aforementioned TEM and DLS results. The zeta potential of the AgNPs was calculated as −27.0 mV, which is closed to previous studies [14,15]. The negatively charged surface of AgNPs could prevent their agglomeration due to generation of repulsion force between AgNPs, and thus, stablizing the polydispersion of AgNPs in their colloidal sollution.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 42%
“…Obviously, the plasmon peak was observed at 404 nm ( figure 2(d)) indicating the presence of nanosized Ag particles, which is in accordance with the aforementioned TEM and DLS results. The zeta potential of the AgNPs was calculated as −27.0 mV, which is closed to previous studies [14,15]. The negatively charged surface of AgNPs could prevent their agglomeration due to generation of repulsion force between AgNPs, and thus, stablizing the polydispersion of AgNPs in their colloidal sollution.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 42%
“…Various studies have shown that a coverage of AgNPs in Journal of Nanomaterials human dentin can prevent biofilm formation on the surface of the dentin as well as inhibit bacterial growth around it [18,24]. According to the characterization of AgNPs, it is very well known that particles with zeta potential values between +30 and −30 mV are considered a stable suspension limiting the agglomeration [25,26]. It has been reported that the concentration of AgNO 3 (0.01, 0.1, and 0.5 M) can affect the size of silver nanoparticles (20,25, and 11 nm) and the zeta potential values (−26.37, −37.95, and −28.23, resp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been reported that the concentration of AgNO 3 (0.01, 0.1, and 0.5 M) can affect the size of silver nanoparticles (20,25, and 11 nm) and the zeta potential values (−26.37, −37.95, and −28.23, resp. ); moreover, the pH values in the solution could also promote a high risk of agglomeration when pH values < 7 were used, while pH values > 7 could have better conditions for nonagglomerated particles [26]. Our results from characterization indicate that all AgNP samples had generally good distribution and uniform sizes and shapes, while the potential zeta results suggest that smaller AgNPs could have an increased risk to be agglomerated due to low electrical charge (−19.1 ± 52.5 mV) compared to larger particles (−36.5 ± 5.7 mV), agreeing with other reported studies that found similar results [17,26,27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…45 Furthermore, it has been reported that some nanoparticles using different sizes, well-defined zeta potentials, and other specific physicochemical properties can play an important role in the antimicrobial activity against several bacterial species. 18,19,27,46,47 The CsNPs and AgNPs used in this study were indicated to have good distribution and uniform sizes and shapes, while zeta potentials suggest a low risk to be agglomerated due to high electrical charge in CsNPs (52.0±5.4 mV) and AgNPs (−48.4±6.9 mV) samples promoting better particle stability. [48][49][50] It is possible that CsNPs and AgNPs can produce a wider contact area with particular electrical charge, creating synergistic antimicrobial properties and promoting more contact area on the bacteria cell membrane and, in some cases, having the ability to penetrate into the cell leading to bacterial cell death.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%