2018
DOI: 10.1002/jpln.201800042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physics and hydraulics of the rhizosphere network

Abstract: Take home messageMucilage secreted by roots and EPS produced by microorganisms alter the physical properties of the soil solution and impact the water dynamics in the rhizosphere. The high viscosity of mucilage and EPS is responsible for the formation of thin filaments and interconnected thin lamellae that span throughout the soil matrix maintaining the continuity of the liquid phase across the pore space even during severe drying. The impact of these mechanisms on plant and microorganisms needs to be explored. Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0
5

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(32 reference statements)
1
31
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of mucilage on nutrient diffusion can be explained by two main processes: (i) when soil dries, mucilage keeps the rhizosphere wet due to its high water‐holding capacity (McCully and Boyer, 1997; Carminati et al, 2010) and therefore maintains the diffusive transport of nutrients at a higher rate, and (ii) mucilage alters the spatial configuration of the liquid phase and increases its connectivity in drying soil due to its unique properties (water sorption, high viscosity, and low surface tension) (Carminati et al, 2017; Benard et al, 2018). The latter one was the focus of the experiments performed herein to monitor the diffusion coefficient of Cs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The effect of mucilage on nutrient diffusion can be explained by two main processes: (i) when soil dries, mucilage keeps the rhizosphere wet due to its high water‐holding capacity (McCully and Boyer, 1997; Carminati et al, 2010) and therefore maintains the diffusive transport of nutrients at a higher rate, and (ii) mucilage alters the spatial configuration of the liquid phase and increases its connectivity in drying soil due to its unique properties (water sorption, high viscosity, and low surface tension) (Carminati et al, 2017; Benard et al, 2018). The latter one was the focus of the experiments performed herein to monitor the diffusion coefficient of Cs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the soil water content was equal, the difference in diffusion coefficient can be safely assigned to change in spatial distribution of liquid phase within the soil pore spaces. The increase in viscosity of the liquid phase due to the presence of mucilage as the soil dries allows water (liquid phase) to stay connected and aid the diffusion of Cs through a continuous film within the pore space (Carminati et al, 2017; Benard et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This may be quite astonishing since McCully and Boyer (1997) found that free mucilage releases most of its water already at very little suctions. However, we expect that mucilage—when bound to the soil surface—acts in a very different way compared to free mucilage: parts of it are sorbed to the soil surface creating a spider‐web like structure ( Brax et al., 2017, 2018; Benard et al., 2019;) that can hold water also at low suctions opposed to the case of free mucilage. It was found that for fine soils little amount of mucilage was sufficient to increase residual water content, while for very coarse soils 0.8% of dry mucilage per dry soil was required.…”
Section: Pore Scale Hydraulic Processes Affected By Mucilagementioning
confidence: 99%