2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.12.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physicochemical properties and microstructure of fish myofibrillar protein-lipid composite gels: Effects of fat type and concentration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
57
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
7
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is because ultrasonic treatment changed the spatial entanglement of protein molecules, making their structure lose so that part of the protein was dissolved. The protein residues were exposed to water molecules, forming a new hydrogen bond, transforming the α-helix structure into a β-sheet structure [23] , [24] . Hu et al [25] found that high-power ultrasonic treatment (400 W and 600 W) caused an increase in the α-helical structure of soybean protein isolate gel, while low-power treatment (200 W) caused a decrease in the α-helical structure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is because ultrasonic treatment changed the spatial entanglement of protein molecules, making their structure lose so that part of the protein was dissolved. The protein residues were exposed to water molecules, forming a new hydrogen bond, transforming the α-helix structure into a β-sheet structure [23] , [24] . Hu et al [25] found that high-power ultrasonic treatment (400 W and 600 W) caused an increase in the α-helical structure of soybean protein isolate gel, while low-power treatment (200 W) caused a decrease in the α-helical structure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies also reported that gel-strengthening agent could increase the percentage of ⊎-sheet structure and decrease the percentage of ⊍-helix structure, which probably was due to the polysaccharide-protein interactions during the heating process. [33][34][35] There were no significant differences in protein secondary structure between surimi gels with gelatin or xanthan gum and control samples (P > 0.05, Fig. 5).…”
Section: Protein Secondary Structurementioning
confidence: 87%
“…In the production process of surimi, a stable emulsion is produced, combining fish muscle proteins and added lipids [ 28 ]. Lipid droplets may act as active or passive fillers in the gel matrix, i.e., participating, or not, in its network, thereby more or less affecting the texture respectively [ 76 ]. Reportedly, the addition of fat to surimi-based gels significantly increased breaking force, gel water-holding capacity, storage modulus (G′) and loss modulus (G″) [ 76 , 77 ].…”
Section: Non-protein Texture-functional Ingredients In Fish Analogmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lipid droplets may act as active or passive fillers in the gel matrix, i.e., participating, or not, in its network, thereby more or less affecting the texture respectively [ 76 ]. Reportedly, the addition of fat to surimi-based gels significantly increased breaking force, gel water-holding capacity, storage modulus (G′) and loss modulus (G″) [ 76 , 77 ]. The addition of fat also increased whiteness of surimi-based gels, by enhancing light scattering, thereby improving its likeness by trained and non-trained panelists [ 77 , 78 ].…”
Section: Non-protein Texture-functional Ingredients In Fish Analogmentioning
confidence: 99%