Methods for General and Molecular Microbiology 2014
DOI: 10.1128/9781555817497.ch14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physicochemical Factors in Growth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
187
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 195 publications
(191 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
187
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After injection, the overpressure was released to obtain final headspace concentrations of 0-5 % CO 2 and 0-20 % O 2 . To test if the strains could grow under anoxic conditions by fermentation or anaerobic respiration, tubes containing 0 % O 2 with 0 or 1 % CO 2 were injected with a reducing solution of 1 mM (final concentration) DTT and cysteine or 0.05 % (final concentration) cysteine-HCl prior to inoculation with bacteria (Breznak & Costilow, 2007). An increase in turbidity by at least 50 % of the optical density (OD 600 ) measured at the time of inoculation was considered evidence for growth.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After injection, the overpressure was released to obtain final headspace concentrations of 0-5 % CO 2 and 0-20 % O 2 . To test if the strains could grow under anoxic conditions by fermentation or anaerobic respiration, tubes containing 0 % O 2 with 0 or 1 % CO 2 were injected with a reducing solution of 1 mM (final concentration) DTT and cysteine or 0.05 % (final concentration) cysteine-HCl prior to inoculation with bacteria (Breznak & Costilow, 2007). An increase in turbidity by at least 50 % of the optical density (OD 600 ) measured at the time of inoculation was considered evidence for growth.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pH range for growth was determined by measuring the optical densities (wavelength 600 nm) of R2A broth cultures after 3 days. pH was adjusted prior to sterilization to pH 4-10 (at intervals of 1.0 pH unit) using appropriate biological buffers (Breznak & Costilow, 2007;Delory & King, 1945): citrate/Na 2 HPO 4 buffer, pH 4.0-5.0; phosphate buffer, pH 6.0-7.0; Tris buffer, pH 8.0-9.0; and NaHCO 3 /Na 2 CO 3 buffer, pH 10.0. Verification of the pH after autoclaving revealed only minor changes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pH range for bacterial growth was estimated by measuring the optical densities (wavelength 600 nm) of R2A broth cultures. The pH of the medium was adjusted prior to sterilization to pH 4.0-9.0 (at intervals of 0.5 pH unit) using the following biological buffers (Breznak & Costilow, 2007): citrate/Na 2 HPO 4 (for pH 4.0-5.5), phosphate (for pH 6.0-7.5), and Tris (for pH 8.0-9.0). Verification of the pH values after autoclaving revealed only minor changes.…”
Section: Mucilaginibacter Rigui Wpcb133 T (Eu747841)mentioning
confidence: 99%