2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2012.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physicochemical factors affecting leaching of laterite ore in hydrochloric acid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
15
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
15
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the increasing of rheology had not a noticeable influence on the kinetics. Some scholars [2,29,31] have completed studies on different laterite ores in the atmosphere hydrochloric acid leaching conditions. Li et al [2] studied the effect of physicochemical factors on laterite ore leaching in hydrochloric acid.…”
Section: Advances In Computer Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the increasing of rheology had not a noticeable influence on the kinetics. Some scholars [2,29,31] have completed studies on different laterite ores in the atmosphere hydrochloric acid leaching conditions. Li et al [2] studied the effect of physicochemical factors on laterite ore leaching in hydrochloric acid.…”
Section: Advances In Computer Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under alkaline conditions, the oxidizability of Mn 2+ is weakened, whereas its reducibility is enhanced. 2 , and MnO 2 through added NaOH used to controlling the pH, leaving Mg 2+ in the liquor. Then Ni and Co were leached in the acid, and the separation of manganese was realized since MnO 2 does not dissolve in dilute acidic liquors.…”
Section: Advances In Computer Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The solutions used in these studies can be given as sulphuric acid (Georgiou and Papangelakis, 1998;Agacayak and Zedef, 2012;Luo et al, 2010;Stopic et al, 2002;Ayanda et al, 2011;Rubisov et al, 2000;Agatzini-Leonardou and Zafiratos, 2004;McDonald and Whittington, 2008a;Thubakgale et al, 2013;Landers et al, 2009;Mohammadreza et al, 2014), hydrochloric acid (Ayanda et al, 2011;Park and Nam, 2008;Agacayak et. al., 2011;Olanipekun, 2000;Wang et al 2012;Guo et al, 2015;McDonald and Whittington, 2008b;Li et al, 2012), nitric acid (Agacayak and Zedef, 2013;Ayanda et al, 2011;Ma et al, 2013), ammonia (Zhai et al, 2010;Zuniga et al, 2010), citric acid, oxalic acid and acetic acid (Sahu et al, 2011;Behera et al, 2010;Panchanadikar, 1993, Kursunoglu andKaya, 2015). The main aim in leaching studies is to provide metal extraction with high recovery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with pressure acid leaching process, atmospheric acid leaching process has the advantages of high extraction efficiency, low energy consumption and low equipment cost etc. [5][6][7][8] However, as for acid leaching process, it is worth noting that many impurity ions (for example, Fe 3+ , Mg 2+ and Mn 2+ , etc.) besides Ni 2+ are co-existing in the acid solution after leaching process, and importantly, the content of impurity ions is even higher than that of Ni 2+ in the leaching solution, which might lead to nickel loss and difficult separation [9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it can be observed that when the initial acid concentration increased from 2.75 to 3.0 mol·L -1 , the leaching efficiencies of Mn, Co and Mg increased from 87.0% to 97.7%, 84.8% to 97.7% and 72.6% to 80.5%, respectively, indicating that the initial acid concentration had greater effect on promoting the leaching efficiencies of Mn, Co and Mg compared with that of other metals. This can be explained that the metal efficiencies might be related to the elemental distributions in the ores and mineral dissolution behaviors[8]. However, it is worth noting that the content of Mn and Co in the laterite blends is about 0.75%, namely, it has little effects on the overall concentration of metal ion in the leaching solution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%