2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.01.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physico-chemical changes of ZnO nanoparticles with different size and surface chemistry under physiological pH conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, particle size did not affect solubility, as demonstrated by dissolutions of ~24%, 0.2%, and 2.8% in simulated gastric fluid, intestinal fluid, and plasma, respectively, for both particle sizes ( Figure 2 ). The high dissolution properties of ZnO NPs under acidic and gastric conditions [ 28 ] and low solubility in neutral fluids have been well reported [ 29 , 30 ], which is in good agreement with our results. Further investigation on ex vivo solubility showed ~12%, ~9%, and 2% dissolution of both bulk and nano ZnOs in rat-extracted gastric, intestinal, and plasma fluids, respectively, without statistical significances between particle sizes ( Figure 3 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…However, particle size did not affect solubility, as demonstrated by dissolutions of ~24%, 0.2%, and 2.8% in simulated gastric fluid, intestinal fluid, and plasma, respectively, for both particle sizes ( Figure 2 ). The high dissolution properties of ZnO NPs under acidic and gastric conditions [ 28 ] and low solubility in neutral fluids have been well reported [ 29 , 30 ], which is in good agreement with our results. Further investigation on ex vivo solubility showed ~12%, ~9%, and 2% dissolution of both bulk and nano ZnOs in rat-extracted gastric, intestinal, and plasma fluids, respectively, without statistical significances between particle sizes ( Figure 3 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…A variety of different constituents, pH and temperature regimes, which vary depending on the purpose of each study, have been used to assess solubility of nanomaterials. Examples include the following: phosphate buffer saline (PBS) adjusted to pH 1.2, 6.8 and 7.4 to simulate gastric, intestinal and plasma conditions respectively (Gwak et al 2015 ); NaCl/pepsin solution adjusted to pH 1.5 with HCL to simulate gastric conditions (Cho et al 2013 ); Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), pH 7.68 and BEGM held at 37 °C (Mu et al 2014 ; Xia et al 2008 ); ALF and Gamble solution at 38 °C to simulate alveolar and interstitial lung fluid respectively (Stebounova et al 2011 ); 0.01 M Ca(NO 3 ) 2 buffered with 2 mM piperazine- N , N ′-bisethanesulfonic acid (PIPES) to pH 7.5 ± 0.1 held at 21 °C (Yin et al 2015 ). Constituents of simulated biological media, such as organic and inorganic ligands, may either increase or decrease dissolution, and therefore, the impact of media components on solubility must be understood for each ENM (David et al 2012 ; Li et al 2011 ; Mu et al 2014 ; Mudunkotuwa et al 2012 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cellular uptake of ZnO20, as analyzed by fluorescence intensity, was more than 20 times greater than that of ZnO70. According to our quantitative analyses of Cy5.5 labelling using UV-vis spectroscopy, approximately 2.5 times more Cy5.5 was conjugated on ZnO20 than on ZnO70, due to their difference in specific surface area (27.7 m 2 /g and 16.6 m 2 /g for ZnO20 and ZnO70, respectively [46]). Nevertheless, a markedly and significantly higher amount of ZnO20 as compared to ZnO70 was internalized into the HaCaT cells.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Cellular Uptake and Internalization Pathway Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%