2021
DOI: 10.14419/ijac.v9i2.31641
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physico-chemical and combustion analyses of bio-briquettes from biochar produced from pyrolysis of groundnut shell

Abstract: The initiative of using biomass as a preference source of energy is vindicated by its availability, abundance, easy accessibility and its eco-friendly nature. This therefore calls for the conversion of agricultural wastes to usable form. This study is aimed to investigate the physicochemical and combustion properties of briquettes obtained from pyrolyzed biochar of groundnut shell. The groundnut shell biochar briquette bonded with cassava starch as binder were molded and analyzed. Proximate analysis, ultimate … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…35 Figure 2 reveals that cashew leaves exhibited the highest VM content (83.24%), while groundnut shell had the lowest (68.17%). It can be observed that the VM content of cashew leaves in this study was significantly greater than the value of 65.33% reported by Bhavsar et al 36 Conversely, the VM content of groundnut shell in our study was lower compared with the results of 76.90%, 37 75.27, 38 80.24, 39 and 75.57% 40 but slightly higher than 64.63%. 41 These variations can be attributed to geographical differences.…”
Section: Proximate Hhv and Ultimate Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35 Figure 2 reveals that cashew leaves exhibited the highest VM content (83.24%), while groundnut shell had the lowest (68.17%). It can be observed that the VM content of cashew leaves in this study was significantly greater than the value of 65.33% reported by Bhavsar et al 36 Conversely, the VM content of groundnut shell in our study was lower compared with the results of 76.90%, 37 75.27, 38 80.24, 39 and 75.57% 40 but slightly higher than 64.63%. 41 These variations can be attributed to geographical differences.…”
Section: Proximate Hhv and Ultimate Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%