2019
DOI: 10.1109/tcsi.2018.2873777
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physically Unclonable Functions Using Foundry SRAM Cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figure 7, the pass rates for all combinations are higher than 90%, and RC2 combinations of RC2-VD4 and RC2-VD5 show similar pass rates compared to the NIST recommended random data (NIST RND) [30]. Any bit bias for the entire bit strings of the PUF output can be checked using T1, T2 or T3 [11], which exhibits pass rates >0.95 for all combinations. However, the result of T4 shows that RC1 has more consecutive 1′s or 0′s than RC2.…”
Section: Randomnessmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As shown in Figure 7, the pass rates for all combinations are higher than 90%, and RC2 combinations of RC2-VD4 and RC2-VD5 show similar pass rates compared to the NIST recommended random data (NIST RND) [30]. Any bit bias for the entire bit strings of the PUF output can be checked using T1, T2 or T3 [11], which exhibits pass rates >0.95 for all combinations. However, the result of T4 shows that RC1 has more consecutive 1′s or 0′s than RC2.…”
Section: Randomnessmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…As can be seen in (11), the falling time at the time of discharging the RC2 is also slower than that of RC1 due to the second term in (11) when compared to (2) of the RC1. As expected, the output of the RC circuit changes according to the challenge bit pattern during the "transient-state."…”
Section: Rc Puf Simulationmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent works have defined various classifications for PUFs that are based on how a PUF's intrinsic variations are exploited for the response bit generation. The most commonly used classes divide into bi-stable or delay-based PUFs [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. Other works also target the class of analog-based PUF designs [22][23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Classification Of Pufsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Process variation: Although SRAM cells are designed symmetrically, a cell initializes to a certain state at power up due to process variation and noise. Process variation leads to a mismatch between the two inverters in the SRAM cell and is the main source of randomness [11]. Process variation can be categorized into two sub-categories: global and local variation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%