2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-1356-1_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physically-Driven Logic Restructuring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the conventional CMOS technology, fanout optimization has been well-studied, both as a method to improve the critical path delay [1]- [5] and as a method of optimizing special highfanout nets such as clock and reset signals [6]. However, the techniques developed for CMOS technology are not generally transferable to many emerging technologies such as superconducting electronics (e.g., AQFP [7], RQL [8], RSFQ [9]) and spintronics [10], which generally have tight, explicit fanout bounds and/or significantly different timing models (clocked gates, for example).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the conventional CMOS technology, fanout optimization has been well-studied, both as a method to improve the critical path delay [1]- [5] and as a method of optimizing special highfanout nets such as clock and reset signals [6]. However, the techniques developed for CMOS technology are not generally transferable to many emerging technologies such as superconducting electronics (e.g., AQFP [7], RQL [8], RSFQ [9]) and spintronics [10], which generally have tight, explicit fanout bounds and/or significantly different timing models (clocked gates, for example).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%