2013
DOI: 10.1111/phib.12007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physicalism and Moorean Supervenience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“… As Polger (, 84) notes, the issues here are similar to those that figure in certain discussions of metaphysical grounding (Bennett , Dasgupta , deRosset ). My discussion is geared towards Polger's use of this regress‐theoretic concern as a response to Horgan's rejection of brute supervenience, and I do not claim that the considerations that I offer directly bear on the notion of grounding, the question of what grounds grounding, and so on. …”
mentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… As Polger (, 84) notes, the issues here are similar to those that figure in certain discussions of metaphysical grounding (Bennett , Dasgupta , deRosset ). My discussion is geared towards Polger's use of this regress‐theoretic concern as a response to Horgan's rejection of brute supervenience, and I do not claim that the considerations that I offer directly bear on the notion of grounding, the question of what grounds grounding, and so on. …”
mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…On the other hand, I believe that some recent critical discussions of Horgan's position on these issues miss the mark, but do so instructively. My focus will be the discussions due to Tom Polger () and Jessica Wilson (). Polger and Wilson agree with Horgan's general view that sufficient conditions for physicalism cannot be given in terms of supervenience .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… See Howell (2009) and Polger (2013).30 Two points are worth noting. First, it should be emphasized that the concerns here arise specifically for the truthmaking-based approach to physicalism, and (perhaps unlike the concerns raised in Sect.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%