Physical therapist postprofessional education in the United States and Australia

Abstract

Background: In line with policy recommendations from the World Confederation of Physical Therapy, Australia (AUS) and the United States (USA) actively promote postprofessional physical therapist education. Although postprofessional education pathways vary, the goal of educating specialists within the profession is shared. Objectives: In order to advance education, and ultimately the profession, it is necessary to understand what is offered for postprofessional programs. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate and compare physical therapist postprofessional education in two regions of the world. Methods: Data were collected from relevant professional organizations, electronic media, and academic programs. Descriptive statistics were generated to compare postprofessional programs in AUS and USA. Major Findings: Variation was demonstrated in postprofessional education between both countries. Notably, the number of programs was observed to be growing in the USA, but declining in AUS, where six programs closed during data collection. AUS offered 41 postprofessional programs, while the USA offered 242 residency, and 49 fellowship, programs. USA and AUS had the most programs in musculoskeletal / sports, 42.6% and 24.4% respectively. Conversely, geriatrics comprised only 7.4% of USA residence programs and 0% of AUS clinical academic programs. Conclusion: This research compared postprofessional education in AUS and USA and demonstrated universal issues related to accessibility and programming. The declining number of programs in AUS is of great concern and warrants evaluation of postprofessional education globally. Educators need to ensure that postprofessional education is accessible, innovative, meets the population needs. This research demonstrates opportunities for international collaboration within the physical therapy profession to advance education and ultimately the profession.

Factors Contributing to Physical Therapists’ Job and Career Satisfaction in the United States: Results From a National Survey

“…The purpose of residency and fellowship training is to “build on [PTs] foundational knowledge and facilitate the development of advanced practitioners with enhanced skills in a defined area of practice.” 31,32 As such, residency and/or fellowship training is one pathway to specialization and subspecialization, respectively, but they are not the only approach. 33,34 Attending a PT residency or fellowship in the United States is a choice and is not a requirement to become licensed, to practice, or to specialize. 31,32,34 At the current time, there are not a sufficient number of accredited residency or fellowship programs to provide residency or fellowship training for all PTs in the United States.…”

Searching our mindset – looking at places and spaces in education

“…While it is a common goal of pre-professional physical therapy education to embed a commitment and passion for lifelong learning in our students, formal post-qualification programmes need to be available to facilitate this. Thanks to Westervelt and colleagues [13], we have an international collaboration between the US and Australian authors that review what formal programmes are on offer in the two counties. More importantly, they reflect on the gaps in what is on offer, provoking us to consider if we are meeting the needs of the population.…”