2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2003.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical rock properties from the Athabasca Group: designing geophysical exploration models for unconformity uranium deposits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
(2 reference statements)
1
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in agreement with the log data from the borehole CX-61, showing an average velocity varying from approximately 3800 m∕s near the surface to 4400 m∕s above the unconformity ( Figure 10). The stacking velocity is also within the range of measured velocities for sandstones in the western Athabasca Basin, but significantly lower than velocities (4500-1600 m∕s) for sandstones in the McArthur River area (Mwenifumbo et al, 2004). Velocity models from regional seismic profiles in the McArthur River area show velocities in rough agreement with our stacking velocity.…”
Section: Data Processingsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…This is in agreement with the log data from the borehole CX-61, showing an average velocity varying from approximately 3800 m∕s near the surface to 4400 m∕s above the unconformity ( Figure 10). The stacking velocity is also within the range of measured velocities for sandstones in the western Athabasca Basin, but significantly lower than velocities (4500-1600 m∕s) for sandstones in the McArthur River area (Mwenifumbo et al, 2004). Velocity models from regional seismic profiles in the McArthur River area show velocities in rough agreement with our stacking velocity.…”
Section: Data Processingsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Coincidentally, Mwenifumbo et al . () also documented significant changes for in situ density, V P velocity, and acoustic impedance of the MF Read Formation, which extends throughout the basin. These changes also correlate significantly with comparable resistivity variations.…”
Section: Acoustic Properties – Mineralization Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…From well log data investigations in the Shea Creek area, Mwenifumbo et al . () provided some specifics about the Athabasca Group physical properties from the western part of the basin.…”
Section: Acoustic Properties – Mineralization Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However some advanced research as study of multi-parameter (resistivity, density, porosity, velocity) borehole geophysical measurement is necessary [20] to know the physical rock property data in the target A1 and B1.…”
Section: Maps International Journal Of Geosciencesmentioning
confidence: 99%