Physical rehabilitation of central facial palsy: A survey of current multidisciplinary practice

Vaughan, Annabelle; Copley, Anna; Miles, Anna

doi:10.1080/17549507.2021.2013533

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 39 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…42 There are seven subtypes of neurotoxin (A-G), type A being the most common to treat focal dystonia. 43 The toxin works by blocking neuromuscular transmission at the motor end plate 44 and is preferentially taken up by hyperactive muscles, therefore is useful in the treatment of synkinesis. 45 The most common formulations in the United Kingdom include Botox and Dysport with conversion rates of around 1:3 (respectively).…”

Section: Botulinum Toxinmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Treatment effects usually begin after 3 days and last for 3 to 4 months. 44,48 Patients will often require repeat injections; therefore, ongoing clinic follow-up is an important consideration in running a facial function service. This challenge may be offset by encouraging all individuals within the MDT to be trained to administer and deliver treatment in dedicated botulinum toxin clinics, as undertaken at the author's center.…”

Section: Botulinum Toxinmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Evaluation of the Patient with Facial Palsy: A Multidisciplinary Approach

Kanona,

Saeed,

Randhawa

et al. 2024

Facial Plast Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Botulinum Toxinmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Botulinum Toxinmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of the Patient with Facial Palsy: A Multidisciplinary Approach

Kanona,

Saeed,

Randhawa

et al. 2024

Facial Plast Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The care of patients with central facial palsy is insufficient and rehabilitation guidelines are required [ 44 ]. To improve treatment and establish guidelines, deficits or remaining abilities must be identified first.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Is There a Difference in Facial Emotion Recognition after Stroke with vs. without Central Facial Paresis?

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Facial Feedback Hypothesis (FFH) states that facial emotion recognition is based on the imitation of facial emotional expressions and the processing of physiological feedback. In the light of limited and contradictory evidence, this hypothesis is still being debated. Therefore, in the present study, emotion recognition was tested in patients with central facial paresis after stroke. Performance in facial vs. auditory emotion recognition was assessed in patients with vs. without facial paresis. The accuracy of objective facial emotion recognition was significantly lower in patients with vs. without facial paresis and also in comparison to healthy controls. Moreover, for patients with facial paresis, the accuracy measure for facial emotion recognition was significantly worse than that for auditory emotion recognition. Finally, in patients with facial paresis, the subjective judgements of their own facial emotion recognition abilities differed strongly from their objective performances. This pattern of results demonstrates a specific deficit in facial emotion recognition in central facial paresis and thus provides support for the FFH and points out certain effects of stroke.

show abstract

Looking back but also forward

Munro¹,

Cardell²

2022

International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Physical rehabilitation of central facial palsy: A survey of current multidisciplinary practice

Cited by 3 publications

References 39 publications

Evaluation of the Patient with Facial Palsy: A Multidisciplinary Approach

Evaluation of the Patient with Facial Palsy: A Multidisciplinary Approach

Is There a Difference in Facial Emotion Recognition after Stroke with vs. without Central Facial Paresis?

Looking back but also forward

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About