2009
DOI: 10.13031/2013.26810
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical Properties and Pyrolysis Behavior of Fractionated Poultry Litter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
4
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This implies that the coarse fraction is the dominant contributor to the compressibility of raw pecan shells. This is in contrast to the study on poultry litter [23] that found that the fine fraction was the main contributor to the compressibility of raw poultry litter. Compressibility of the pecan shells ranged in values from 1.33% to 10.5% (Fig.…”
Section: Particle Size Effectcontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This implies that the coarse fraction is the dominant contributor to the compressibility of raw pecan shells. This is in contrast to the study on poultry litter [23] that found that the fine fraction was the main contributor to the compressibility of raw poultry litter. Compressibility of the pecan shells ranged in values from 1.33% to 10.5% (Fig.…”
Section: Particle Size Effectcontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…A similar result was obtained by Bernhart and Fasina [23] for raw and fractionated poultry litter. The flow index values were obtained from the inverse of the slope of the linear fit of the flow function graph from flow function (FF) plots (example shown in Fig.…”
Section: Flow Propertiessupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The litter used in this study agreed with Henry's observation at 24.12% within 4.3%. Bernhart and Fasina (2009) provided a detailed study of the physical properties of whole and fractionated poultry litter. They reported a whole litter bulk density of 542 kg/m 3 .…”
Section: Results and Discussion Plant Nutrient Solids Content And Bumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Hausner ratio (defined as tap density/bulk density) can be used as an indicator of the flowability of milled materials (Bernhart and Fasina, 2009). The Hausner ratio of the samples and the blends varies slightly from 1.26 to 1.33.…”
Section: Physical Characteristics Relevant To Processability and Feedingmentioning
confidence: 99%