1985
DOI: 10.1007/bf01084460
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical parameters of visual binaries with computed orbits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This would require a separation of a few times the radius of the presupernova star, if the stellar companion is also a massive star, implying a separation of D1012È1013 cm. The observed distribution of initial orbital separations of massive stars is (e.g., a init D1/a init Kraicheva et al 1979), so tens of percent of massive binaries are expected to be in this range of separations.…”
Section: Allowed Formation Historiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This would require a separation of a few times the radius of the presupernova star, if the stellar companion is also a massive star, implying a separation of D1012È1013 cm. The observed distribution of initial orbital separations of massive stars is (e.g., a init D1/a init Kraicheva et al 1979), so tens of percent of massive binaries are expected to be in this range of separations.…”
Section: Allowed Formation Historiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if the internal energy of the envelope is efficiently used to unbind the envelope, we find α > 2. Using the initial mass function Kroupa et al 1993) and the distribution in orbital separation Γ(a) ∝ a −1 (Kraicheva et al 1978), we found that the number of systems that experienced a helium flash is comparable to the number of systems that ignited helium non-degenerately with α < 5. Thus, if the internal energy can unbind the envelope, we are less confident in excluding the non-degenerate scenario.…”
Section: The Orbital Separationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a sharp cutoff in the number of very wide binaries with physical separations greater than 0.1 pc, possibly dictated by dynamical evolution, as stated in classical (Tolbert 1964;Kraicheva et al 1985;Abt 1988;Weinberg & Wasserman 1988;Weis 1988;Close et al 1990;Latham et al 1991;Wasserman & Weinberg 1991 and references above) and modern works (Allen et al 2000;Palasi 2000;Chanamé & Gould 2004;Lépine & Bongiorno 2007;Makarov et al 2008). My aim is to characterise and look for very wide binaries and multiple systems with projected physical separations larger than s = 0.1 pc (2 × 10 4 AU).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%