2009
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/200912596
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reaching the boundary between stellar kinematic groups and very wide binaries

Abstract: Aims. I look for and characterise very wide binaries and multiple systems with projected physical separations larger than s = 0.1 pc, which is generally believed to be a sharp upper limit to the distribution of wide binary semimajor axes. Methods. I investigated in detail 30 Washington double stars with angular separations of ρ > 1000 arcsec. I discarded 23 of them as probably unbound systems based on discordant astrometry, photometry, spectral types, and radial velocities. The remaining seven systems were sub… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
72
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 126 publications
4
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The targets identified in this work are candidate wide companions to these previously identified highprobability members. In that respect this work differs from the majority of previous works aimed at identifying new members and is more similar to works related to wide binaries (Caballero 2009(Caballero , 2010Alonso-Floriano et al 2015). The formation mechanism and implications of such wide (1000−100 000 au) companions will be discussed in further work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The targets identified in this work are candidate wide companions to these previously identified highprobability members. In that respect this work differs from the majority of previous works aimed at identifying new members and is more similar to works related to wide binaries (Caballero 2009(Caballero , 2010Alonso-Floriano et al 2015). The formation mechanism and implications of such wide (1000−100 000 au) companions will be discussed in further work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The question of multiplicity for members of NYMGs is occasionally difficult, as some independent members of moving groups may be picked up by surveys as extremely wide common proper motion binaries (Caballero 2009(Caballero , 2010Shaya & Olling 2011). Apart from well-known binaries, we have set an informal limit of 500″ for binaries.…”
Section: Multiplicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(a) Some other publications and meta-archives that we have searched for potential CARMENES targets are Kirkpatrick et al (1991), Gizis (1997), Gizis & Reid (1997), Gizis et al (2000b), Henry et al (2002Henry et al ( , 2006, Mochnacki et al (2002), Gray et al (2003), Bochanski et al (2005), Crifo et al (2005), Lodieu et al (2005), Scholz et al (2005), Phan-Bao & Bessell (2006), Reylé et al (2006), Riaz et al (2006), Caballero (2007Caballero ( , 2009Caballero ( , 2012, Gatewood & Coban (2009), Shkolnik et al (2009, 2012, Bergfors et al (2010), Johnson et al (2010), Boyd et al (2011), Irwin et al (2011), West et al (2011, Avenhaus et al (2012), Deacon et al (2012), Janson et al (2012, 2014), Frith et al (2013, Jódar et al (2013), Malo et al (2013), Aberasturi et al (2014), Dieterich et al (2014), Riedel et al (2014), Yi et al (2014), , and the DwarfArchive at http://dwarfarchive.org. (b) PMSU: Reid et al (1995Reid et al ( , 2002; Hawley et al (1996); Gizis et al (2002).…”
Section: Carmenes Samplementioning
confidence: 99%