Physical origin of the relative rate of clocks in GPS and errors of relative motion concept

Šorli, Amrit; Čelan, Štefan; Gorjup, Niko

doi:10.12988/astp.2022.91893

Cited by 13 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…If you are a stationary observer, a clock for you will have a slower rate as if you are an observer which is moving with the clock. Our research results confirm that rate of clocks depend only on the variable energy density of SQS and is valid for all observers [12]. The same is valid for relativistic mass, which is also depending only on the interaction of the moving physical object with SQS and is independent of the observer.…”

Section: Relativistic Mass Is Real and Is Valid For All Observerssupporting

confidence: 84%

See 1 more Smart Citation

SMBH Relativistic Gravity and Dark Matter

Čelan¹,

Šorli²,

Gorjup³

2022

Preprint

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Relativistic Mass Is Real and Is Valid For All Observerssupporting

confidence: 84%

“…Calculation of the given stellar object velocity makes sense only in comparison with a stationary SQS. Einstein's concept [12]. Calculating the relative velocity of a given stellar object regarding whether it is moving closer to the Earth or away from the Earth makes not much sense.…”

Section: Relativistic Mass Is Real and Is Valid For All Observersmentioning

confidence: 99%

SMBH Relativistic Gravity and Dark Matter

Čelan¹,

Šorli²,

Gorjup³

2022

Preprint

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The Doppler effect is all we see. It perfectly matches the effect that we should see with the times in (5). This shows that what (5) describes is simply the Doppler effect as it appears in the coordinate system x 0 , t 0 .…”

Section: On Einstein's Usage Of the Lorentz Transformsupporting

confidence: 84%

“…This shows that what (5) describes is simply the Doppler effect as it appears in the coordinate system x 0 , t 0 . The whole reason why the Lorentz transform makes the speed of light constant in all moving frames R 0 is in the formulas in (5). As it in reality is a description of the Doppler effect, the times T 0 i are not anything real.…”

Section: On Einstein's Usage Of the Lorentz Transformmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cancelled: The Relativity Theory Needs Some Fixing

Jormakka¹

2023

Redefining Standard Model Particle Physics [Cancelled Title]

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article presents a critical analysis of the Special and General Relativity Theories. Both theories are found incomplete and need a revision. The general relativity principle is currently understood as meaning that there is no preferred frame of reference and equations of motion must be Lorentz invariant. These interpretations should be modified to the form that there is no global preferred frame of reference, but there is a local preferred frame of reference given by the local gravitation field, and the equations of motion should be invariant in conformal mappings. The reason why there is a local preferred frame of reference is that the Lorentz transform does not define a valid time for a moving frame and therefore cannot give a set of frames of reference where there is no preferred local frame of reference. As light travels along geodesics of the gravitational field, this local preferred frame is given by the local gravitation field. Much of relativity theory remains after this revision, including the geometric interpretation of gravity, the equivalence principle, time and length dilation in gravitational fields and accelerating frames, time and length dilation between frames in constant relative motion if the local gravitation field is strong enough.

show abstract

“…The variable energy density of space that governs gravity and causes atoms' transformation back into elementary particles in the center of SMBHs is precisely measured by the rate of clocks at a one-meter distance [11].…”

Section: Demystification Of Big Bang Cosmologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Rigorous Analysis of the Universal Space Expansion

Šorli¹

2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Expansion of the universal space was never directly observed. It is an unproven assumption. Measurement of the gravitational redshift proves only gravitational redshift and nothing more. Gravitational redshift is proven by the Mössbauer experiment. Claiming that gravitational redshift proves universal space expansion is false because there is no causality between gravitational redshift and hypothetical expansion. Even if universal space would expand, gravitational redshift could not be taken as proof of expansion. The Doppler effect was never observed in an expanding space and claiming that cosmological redshift is partially caused by the Doppler effect caused by the expanding of space is an unproved assumption. The discovery of CMB proves only that the entire universal space radiates CMB. CMB is not proof of the existence of the recombination period.

show abstract

Physical origin of the relative rate of clocks in GPS and errors of relative motion concept

Cited by 13 publications

References 0 publications

SMBH Relativistic Gravity and Dark Matter

SMBH Relativistic Gravity and Dark Matter

Cancelled: The Relativity Theory Needs Some Fixing

Rigorous Analysis of the Universal Space Expansion

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About