2012
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2011.0251
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical Modeling of U.S. Cotton Yields and Climate Stresses during 1979 to 2005

Abstract: Climate variability and changes affect crop yields by causing climatic stresses during various stages of the plant life cycle. A crop growth model must be able to capture the observed relationships between crop yields and climate stresses before its credible use as a prediction tool. This study evaluated the ability of the geographically distributed cotton growth model redeveloped from GOSSYM in simulating U.S. cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) yields and their responses to climate stresses during 1979 to 2005. D… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, short fiber content and seed coat neps exhibited quadratically declining trends with an increase in temperature, while immature fiber content declined linearly with temperature. The identified temperature‐specific fiber quality indices can be incorporated in cotton simulation models to improve management practices under present and future enhanced temperature levels (Thorp et al, 2014; Liang et al, 2012). However, the influence of soil moisture stress (Lokhande and Reddy, 2014) and nutrients (Reddy et al, 2004) are needed to account other stresses in the production environment with variable weather, soil moisture, and nutrient conditions (Snowden et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, short fiber content and seed coat neps exhibited quadratically declining trends with an increase in temperature, while immature fiber content declined linearly with temperature. The identified temperature‐specific fiber quality indices can be incorporated in cotton simulation models to improve management practices under present and future enhanced temperature levels (Thorp et al, 2014; Liang et al, 2012). However, the influence of soil moisture stress (Lokhande and Reddy, 2014) and nutrients (Reddy et al, 2004) are needed to account other stresses in the production environment with variable weather, soil moisture, and nutrient conditions (Snowden et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cotton reproductive performance is mostly determined by fruit setting, retention, and boll weight. Studies conducted in controlled environmental experiments by Reddy et al (1992a, 1992b; 1993, 1997a, 1997b) have quantified several growth and developmental aspects of upland cotton and many of those functions have been incorporated into cotton simulation model, GOSSYM, for field and climate change impact analysis (Liang et al, 2012; Reddy et al, 2002). However, the improved model of GOSSYM and other cotton models in the market do not have fiber modeling components for effective use in the production environment to optimize fiber quality (Thorp et al, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But, more importantly, the effects of UV‐B radiation could be incorporated into a mechanistic model that responds appropriately to environmental conditions and accurately predicts corn responses to weather variables. Such an approach has previously been used by others in the crop‐simulation model of cotton, GOSSYM (Reddy et al, 2003; Liang et al, 2012a, 2012b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, potential temperatures-specific fiber quality indices under optimum water and nutrient conditions [31] [48], nitrogen-specific [49] indices under optimum water and temperature conditions, and water deficit-specific [50] indices under optimum nutrient and temperature conditions are needed to develop a fiber model for cotton. Models equipped with fiber quality would be useful not only in production optimization of natural resources such as water and nutrients, but also in assisting planting dates in the current environment and in policy decisions for the hypothesized changes in future climate [51].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%