2017
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b01500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical Mechanisms of Exchange Coupling Effects in Nanoparticulate Diluted Magnetic Oxides Obtained by Laser Pyrolysis

Abstract: TiO2 nanoparticles, undoped and doped with Fe, have been prepared by laser pyrolysis and further investigated with respect to morphological, structural and magnetic aspects by transmission electron microscopy, diffractometry, Mössbauer spectroscopy, and magnetometry. The obtained nanoparticles, consisting of mainly anatase phase, agglomerate in clusters of tenths of units and present a large size distribution in the range from 5 to 40 nm. The anatase to rutile weight ratio (about 9) and the morphology of part… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is evident that the specific susceptibility in Figure 5C follows a paramagnetic C/T type dependence, with C the Curie constant and T the temperature. Here C = N A* μ 2 /3k B , where k B is the Boltzmann constant, μ is the magnetic moment of the magnetic center, and N A is the Avogadro number 72 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is evident that the specific susceptibility in Figure 5C follows a paramagnetic C/T type dependence, with C the Curie constant and T the temperature. Here C = N A* μ 2 /3k B , where k B is the Boltzmann constant, μ is the magnetic moment of the magnetic center, and N A is the Avogadro number 72 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Finally, the specific magnetization from the hysteresis loop at 10 K in Figure 5D can be corrected also by the paramagnetic contribution (paramagnetic susceptibility multiplied with the applied field) resulting finally a saturated magnetic loop specific to only the ferromagnetic component. The ferromagnetic signal could be due to the defects from the glass network, which conduct to the diluted magnetic oxide behavior 72‐74 . From the saturation magnetization of the ferromagnetic component which equates the Avogadro number multiplied with the magnetic moment contributed to the ferromagnetic ordered phase, the value of the magnetic moment per molecule can be directly obtained.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The negative slope was clearly lower in absolute value at 10 K, giving an indirect indication for an additional paramagnetic contribution of positive slope, which compensates partially for the decrease of magnetization at this temperature. The direct indication for the paramagnetic contribution can be observed from the strong increase of the magnetization at temperatures lower than 20 K (see inset of Figure 8 a) resembling closely to the typical paramagnetic C/T type dependence with C the Curie constant and T the temperature [ 36 ]. The diamagnetic susceptibility of the Te-5 glass can be calculated from the slope of the linear decrease of the magnetization at 300 K, where the paramagnetic contribution was negligible.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…(3) is not valid for these samples too. It is to be noted here that the exchange bias field is cancelled out at a temperature of 50 K, also known as the blocking temperature of exchange bias 31 , being marked in the following as T EB . Hence, samples A and A200 are representative cases of nanoparticulate systems with T EB < T B .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…To note the specific negative shifts of the hysteresis loops in the case of samples A and A200C, better evidenced after cooling the samples in an applied field. This well-known behavior is due to the presence of unidirectional anisotropy in a nanometer size ferromagnetic-like phase interfaced to an antiferromagnetic-like phase [30][31][32] . Among the macroscopic effects of such interfacial interactions are: (1) the increased coercivity of the multi-phase system and (2) the above mentioned shift of the hysteresis loop, denoted as an exchange bias field.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%