“…This makes it possible in principle to address change over the whole 23-year period. Though many samples with this design remain in use in recent publications (e.g., Dolcos et al, 2012;Gayman, Turner & Cui, 2008;Gerstorf, Rocke & Lachman, 2011;Hanson et al, 2011;Kooij & Van De Voork, 2011;Lapi et al, 2009;Mather et al, 2010, Menezes et al, 2011Ramsden et al, 2011;Schelleman-Offermans, Kuntsche & Knibbe, 2011;Whitehead et al, 2011), the limitations of two waves of data for understanding change have been well documented (e.g., Rogosa, 1995;Rogosa, Brandt, & Zimoski, 1982), as have the additional complications introduced by large age ranges within samples (e.g., Sliwinski, Hoftman, & Hofer, 2010). Essentially, the limitations of two waves of data surround the fact that, with only two waves of data, it is not possible to distinguish true between-individual differences in overall level from error of measurement in the estimation of indvidual change trajectories.…”