2006
DOI: 10.1109/jlt.2005.859852
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical Layer scalability of WDM optical packet interconnection networks

Abstract: Abstract-The physical layer scalability of a packet-switched optical interconnection network utilizing semiconductor optical amplifier (SOA) switch elements is investigated experimentally and with numerical modeling. Optical packets containing payloads of multiple wavelength-division-multiplexing (WDM) channels are propagated through cascaded SOA-based switching nodes in a recirculating test-bed environment. Experiments show that bit-error rates (BERs) below 10 −9 can be maintained through 58 switching nodes f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From this selection of routing options, it can be deduced that each SOA hop introduces approximately 0.4 dB of power penalty on average. This result is similar to those for other simplistic SOA-based OPS nodes and modules [11], [15], [17], [23], [24]. Also, in order to demonstrate the wideband transparency of the buffer implementation, eye diagrams for different payload wavelengths are presented as well (Fig.…”
Section: B Power Penaltysupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…From this selection of routing options, it can be deduced that each SOA hop introduces approximately 0.4 dB of power penalty on average. This result is similar to those for other simplistic SOA-based OPS nodes and modules [11], [15], [17], [23], [24]. Also, in order to demonstrate the wideband transparency of the buffer implementation, eye diagrams for different payload wavelengths are presented as well (Fig.…”
Section: B Power Penaltysupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Because these losses depend on which branches are required for a particular module implementation, the SOAs are set to deliver between 6 and 11 dB of gain, which requires between 45 and 75 mA of drive current. The net gain or loss incurred on each packet payload can be kept to less than about 0.5 dB, as in [15], [16], and [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The inherent polarization-dependent gain (PDG) of the SOA, albeit very small in modern devices [11], [12], accumulates as the packets propagate through a cascade of SOA-based nodes and affects the overall system performance. In fact, we observed, in our previous studies of optical packets propagation carrying eight 10-Gb/s WDM channel payloads, that packet polarization influences the node cascadability even when using commercial SOAs with very low PDG [10]. The origin of PDG in SOAs is the fact that bulk active material has much larger transverse electric (TE) amplification than transverse magnetic (TM), which is due to the different confinement factors [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aside from acting as a gating switch, the SOA compensates for the optical power losses from the passive optical components of the node structure (e.g., couplers, delay lines, and connectors). The performance and scalability of SOA-based OPS networks have been investigated for a range of architectures [7], [9], [10], without necessarily considering the effect of the component's polarization dependence. The inherent polarization-dependent gain (PDG) of the SOA, albeit very small in modern devices [11], [12], accumulates as the packets propagate through a cascade of SOA-based nodes and affects the overall system performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%