2022
DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13739
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical functioning and physical activity after gastrointestinal or bladder oncological surgery: An observational cohort study

Abstract: Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the recovery of physical functioning and objective physical activity levels up to 3 months after oncological surgery and to determine the association between physical activity levels and the recovery of physical functioning.Methods: A longditudinal observational cohort study was conducted in patients who underwent gastrointestinal or bladder oncological surgery. Recovery of physical functioning was measured preoperatively, and 1 and 3 months after discharge. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…14 Second, the goal of 30 min per day is based on relatively low sample-size baseline measurements on the specific wards and previous literature. 31 This predefined goal was set preimplementation and could be an underestimation of physical activity in the ward. It might be necessary to adjust these movement goals over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 Second, the goal of 30 min per day is based on relatively low sample-size baseline measurements on the specific wards and previous literature. 31 This predefined goal was set preimplementation and could be an underestimation of physical activity in the ward. It might be necessary to adjust these movement goals over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A previous study evaluating physical activity levels during hospital stay after oncological surgery, using the same movement sensor, found a mean of 37 active minutes per day, with a standard deviation of 13. 24 An effect size of 0.21 was chosen based on previous studies. 24 , 25 This resulted in a minimal sample size of 59 per measurement.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 24 An effect size of 0.21 was chosen based on previous studies. 24 , 25 This resulted in a minimal sample size of 59 per measurement. 26 Sample size analysis was conducted using Statulator: an online statistical calculator.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%