2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10021-008-9188-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical Factors Control Phytoplankton Production and Nitrogen Fixation in Eight Texas Reservoirs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
1
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
20
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, at shallow, upreservoir sites, production rates were more strongly related to trophic state than in open-water portions of the reservoirs. A previous analysis of the 2006 data from these reservoirs demonstrated that phytoplankton production rates were related to nutrient concentrations only at shallow sites (Forbes et al 2008), suggesting a hierarchical structure in predictor variables at spatial scales . del Giorgio and Peters (1993) found that mean planktonic production (mg C m -3 day -1 ) was positively correlated with trophic state (as inferred by chlorophyll concentrations, Eq.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, at shallow, upreservoir sites, production rates were more strongly related to trophic state than in open-water portions of the reservoirs. A previous analysis of the 2006 data from these reservoirs demonstrated that phytoplankton production rates were related to nutrient concentrations only at shallow sites (Forbes et al 2008), suggesting a hierarchical structure in predictor variables at spatial scales . del Giorgio and Peters (1993) found that mean planktonic production (mg C m -3 day -1 ) was positively correlated with trophic state (as inferred by chlorophyll concentrations, Eq.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The reservoirs are likely monomictic, although occasional polymixis may occur. Portions of the study have been published elsewhere: maximum planktonic production and nitrogen fixation rates, nutrient data, and watershed analysis appear in Forbes et al (2008). Four reservoirs (Aquilla, Conroe, Lewisville, and Cedar Creek) were sampled twice, once in summer 2005 and again in summer 2006; four additional reservoirs (Buchanan, Canyon, Stillhouse Hollow, and Texana) were sampled once in summer 2006.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maximum volumetric rates increased in August and September 2004 but were never more than 50% of the rates observed in 2003. Forbes et al (2008) compared summer N 2 fixation rates in main bodies and arms of 8 Texas reservoirs and found that volumetric N 2 fixation rates were highest in systems with small relative drainage areas. While the precise mechanisms have not been determined, these systems presumably had longer detention times, more frequent periods of stagnation, and reduced hydraulic flushing.…”
Section: Interannual Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, Arhonditsis et al (2007) found that along a riverine-to-estuarine gradient, cyanobacteria favored downstream conditions where hydrologic forcing was reduced. Forbes et al (2008) demonstrated that, at various locations within warm, polymictic reservoirs, higher rates of nitrogen fixation occurred at sites with smaller drainage area to water surface area ratios and presumably lower flushing potential. Patoine et al (2006) found that in a series of northern United States lakes, both areal and volumetric estimates of N 2 fixation were strongly correlated to drainage area and lake position along a longitudinal gradient.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation