Physical distancing messages targeting youth on the social media accounts of Canadian public health entities and the use of behavioral change techniques

Abstract

Introduction Physical distancing (PD) is an important public health strategy to reduce the transmission of COVID-19 and has been promoted by public health authorities through social media. Although youth have a tendency to engage in high-risk behaviors that could facilitate COVID-19 transmission, there is limited research on the characteristics of PD messaging targeting this population on social media platforms with which youth frequently engage. This study examined social media posts created by Canadian public health entities (PHEs) with PD messaging aimed at youth and young adults aged 16–29 years and reported behavioral change techniques (BCTs) used in these posts. Methods A content analysis of all social media posts of Canadian PHEs from Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and YouTube were conducted from April 1st to May 31st, 2020. Posts were classified as either implicitly or explicitly targeting youth and young adults. BCTs in social media posts were identified and classified based on Behavior Change Technique Taxonomy version 1 (BCTTv1). Frequency counts and proportions were used to describe the data. Results In total, 319 youth-targeted PD posts were identified. Over 43% of the posts originated from Ontario Regional public health units, and 36.4 and 32.6% of them were extracted from Twitter and Facebook, respectively. Only 5.3% of the total posts explicitly targeted youth. Explicit posts were most frequent from federal PHEs and posted on YouTube. Implicit posts elicited more interactions than explicit posts regardless of jurisdiction level or social media format. Three-quarters of the posts contained at least one BCT, with a greater portion of BCTs found within implicit posts (75%) than explicit posts (52.9%). The most common BCTs from explicit posts were instructions on how to perform a behavior (25.0%) and restructuring the social environment (18.8%). Conclusions There is a need for more PD messaging that explicitly targets youth. BCTs should be used when designing posts to deliver public health messages and social media platforms should be selected depending on the target population.

Discussions of Asperger Syndrome on Social Media: Content and Sentiment Analysis on Twitter

“…Promoting the awareness and acceptance of Asperger and autism by posting informative and factual content on social media platforms such as Twitter could assist in increasing social media users' knowledge about and understanding of the condition. Research on the use of social media for health promotion has shown its positive effects related to different conditions [15][16][17][18][19][20]. However, in our sample, we found that the tweets on Asperger that stimulated higher engagement tended to be neutral.…”

“…This knowledge could be acquired or promoted through social media, where millions of people are exposed daily to all varieties of information, whether they explicitly seek it or find it unintentionally. Research on different conditions shows that health promotion through social media is mostly linked to positive effects [15][16][17][18][19][20].…”

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Internet-Based Communication for Public Health: Systematic Review

“…The studies by Dimanlig-Cruz et al [ 31 ], Hagen et al [ 32 ], Lauran et al [ 33 ], and Slavik et al [ 34 ] dealt with targeting specific population groups. The first and most generalizable study is the one by Lauran et al [ 33 ], who stated that deciding on 1 actor and 1 (homogeneous) stakeholder group is not the right strategy.…”

Políticas Públicas de Saúde para a Juventude - Estudo Bibliométrico e Agenda de Pesquisa com base na Web of Science

“…Com a Figura 2, os 4 grupos estão representados pelo cluster 1, que agrupou as palavras: "youth violence" (5 ocorrências, 18 links), "adolescen-ce" (5,8), "smoking" (5, 6), 'outcomes" (6,12), "alcohol" (6, 9), "community" (7,14), "impact" (8,17), "risk" (11,22), "public health" (20,41); em relação ao cluster 2, foram agrupados os termos "mental health" (5, 21), "mental-health" (5,19), "school" (5,14), "youth violence" (6,19), "united -estates" (7,18), "victimization" (7, 29), "violence" (9,31), "substance use" (11,31); o cluster 3 une as palavras "services" (6, 7), "care" (10,15), "children" (20, 50), "adolescents" (34, 73); e o cluster 4 agrega as palavras "obesity" (6,14), "prevention" (10, 32) e "prevalence" (11,22).…”

“…Paralelamente, a influência das mídias sociais junto ao público jovem também é objeto de análise no campo da saúde pública, o que se observa na pesquisa de Dimanlig-Cruz et al 20 , que estudaram a disseminação de informações sobre saúde em redes sociais durante o período de distanciamento social derivadas da pandemia, inclusive pelo alto nível de disseminação do vírus entre os jovens.…”