1993
DOI: 10.1007/bf02253535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical dependence on nicotine gum: effect of duration of use

Abstract: This study examined whether longer duration on nicotine gum promoted dependence on nicotine gum. Subjects (N = 128) answering an advertisement for smoking cessation research and wanting to quit smoking cigarettes were randomly assigned to 1- or 3-month duration of nicotine gum use. Assessments were made weekly for smoking status (with biochemical verification) and withdrawal symptoms during and at the end of treatment. Follow-up was conducted at 1, 6 and 12 months to provide exploratory data on treatment outco… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They do not however address the issue of dependence with long-term use, which may lead to continued use beyond treatment recommendations. Abrupt cessation of nicotine gum may lead to withdrawal (Hatsukami et al 1991(Hatsukami et al , 1993, suggesting that some dependence may occur. Indeed, use beyond the recommended treatment has been observed (Spyker et al 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They do not however address the issue of dependence with long-term use, which may lead to continued use beyond treatment recommendations. Abrupt cessation of nicotine gum may lead to withdrawal (Hatsukami et al 1991(Hatsukami et al , 1993, suggesting that some dependence may occur. Indeed, use beyond the recommended treatment has been observed (Spyker et al 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subjective measures included: a) a Tobacco Use Questionnaire asking about current tobacco use status (cigarettes and other tobacco products); b) a daily diary detailing the number of assigned products used and usual cigarettes smoked; c) the Minnesota Nicotine Withdrawal Scale , a widely used scale assessing withdrawal from cigarettes (12-14), nicotine gum (15, 16) and smokeless tobacco (15, 17) d) Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND, 18); e) Centers for Epidemiological Studies 20-item scale (CES-D) assessing current symptoms of depression (19) and f) Perceived Health Risk , a ladder involving rating risk for addiction to a product on a scale ranging from 1 to 10 (6). All of these measures were assessed at baseline.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subjective measures included: (i) a tobacco use questionnaire that asked about current tobacco use status (cigarettes and other tobacco products), number of ≥24-hour quit attempts and duration of abstinence during these quit attempts; (ii) a daily diary detailing the number of cigarettes smoked; (iii) the Minnesota Nicotine Withdrawal Scale, a widely used scale that assesses withdrawal from cigarettes [2224], nicotine gum [25,26] and smokeless tobacco [25,27]; (iv) the Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND, [28]), the most widely used and psychometrically tested scale for nicotine dependence; and (v) perceived health risk, a ladder involving rating risk for addiction of a product on a scale ranging from 1 to 10. All these measures were assessed at baseline.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%