2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical-chemical properties of dental composites and adhesives containing silane-modified SBA-15

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding FS results, the experimental un lled adhesive yielded signi cantly higher values than the rest of the adhesive tested followed by the 0.5%Arg@MSNs and 1% Arg@MSNs adhesives, and signi cantly higher than that obtained for 2%Arg@MSNs adhesive. The higher FS values determined for the un lled experimental adhesive can be explained by its homogeneous composition, as it mainly contains methacrylate monomers [52]. The lowest values were recorded by the commercial adhesive SBUP, without statistical differences with SB1XT.…”
Section: Physico-mechanical Properties Of the Experimental Dental Adh...mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Regarding FS results, the experimental un lled adhesive yielded signi cantly higher values than the rest of the adhesive tested followed by the 0.5%Arg@MSNs and 1% Arg@MSNs adhesives, and signi cantly higher than that obtained for 2%Arg@MSNs adhesive. The higher FS values determined for the un lled experimental adhesive can be explained by its homogeneous composition, as it mainly contains methacrylate monomers [52]. The lowest values were recorded by the commercial adhesive SBUP, without statistical differences with SB1XT.…”
Section: Physico-mechanical Properties Of the Experimental Dental Adh...mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Regarding the FS results, the experimental unfilled adhesives yielded significantly higher values than the rest of the adhesive tested, followed by the 0.5% Arg@MSN and 1% Arg@MSN adhesives, and significantly higher values than those obtained for the 2% Arg@MSN adhesive. The higher FS values determined for the unfilled experimental adhesive can be explained by its homogeneous composition, as it mainly contains methacrylate monomers [ 52 ]. The lowest values were recorded by the commercial adhesive SBUP, without significant differences from SB1XT.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, the least filled composite Filtek Supreme XT (55.6 vol%) absorbed far more water than the other composites. Moreover, physical and chemical interactions between the matrix and the filler at the interphase strongly affected the water diffusion within the polymeric matrix [ 19 ]. Improper silanization of filler particles increases the hydrophilic surface area and, consequently, the pathway for water sorption [ 8 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%