2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0169-4332(03)00264-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical characterization of thin ALD–Al2O3 films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

6
47
1
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
6
47
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The depletion of hydrogen from the Al 2 O 3 / c-Si interface likely contributes to the decrease of the surface passivation by Al 2 O 3 after firing. 2,18,19 Furthermore, the structural changes of the Al 2 O 3 will render the influence of the firing step irreversible.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The depletion of hydrogen from the Al 2 O 3 / c-Si interface likely contributes to the decrease of the surface passivation by Al 2 O 3 after firing. 2,18,19 Furthermore, the structural changes of the Al 2 O 3 will render the influence of the firing step irreversible.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, it is obvious that Al 2 O 3 is not an efficient diffusion barrier for Si. Jakschik et al 10 observed a similar behavior upon annealing Al 2 O 3 deposited on silicon expecting Si diffusion along the grain boundaries. The carbon profile ͑not shown͒ was not affected by heat treatments even above the crystallization temperature ͑900°C͒.…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The H concentration increased significantly at the interface probably due to H diffusion whilst the Si profile showed an out-diffusion after annealing at 1273 K indicating that Al 2 O 3 is not a diffusion barrier for Si in agreement with literature reports of Al 2 O 3 deposited on Si. [19] The C profile was not affected by temperature treatment even above crystallization temperature (T > 1173 K).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 90%