1995
DOI: 10.1039/ja9951000043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical behaviour of nickel and copper modifiers used in the determination of selenium by electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry

Abstract: Scanning electron microscopy and visual examination were used to study the physical changes occurring with temperature when Ni and Cu were used as modifiers for Se. During the pyrolysis stage of the electrothermal atomizer heating cycle, the Ni or Cu matrix was observed to shrink as the metal salt decomposed to the oxide and then the metal. This may have resulted in physical entrapment of Se, which coprecipitated with the excess of modifier salt during the drying stage, and this could contribute significantly … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This phenomenon was introduced to routine GFAAS analysis by Welz et al It offered, on one hand, the possibility of GFAAS analysis of volatile elements. On the other hand, it triggered a lot of research activities devoted to understanding the mechanism of analyte retention of the palladium modifier. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon was introduced to routine GFAAS analysis by Welz et al It offered, on one hand, the possibility of GFAAS analysis of volatile elements. On the other hand, it triggered a lot of research activities devoted to understanding the mechanism of analyte retention of the palladium modifier. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other researchers have examined the use of an alternative purge gas or gas mixture during the drying and pyrolysis steps to improve peak shapes and/or sensitivity of Sn (O 2 /Ar) (Rademeyer and Vermaak, 1992), Se (H 2 ) (Mahmood et al, 1995), and Si (CH 4 /Ar) (Schleisman and Bollinger, 1995). In each case the peak profiles are improved and sharpened and the detection limits are improved.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%